View Single Post
  #1  
Old 11-08-2006, 07:34 PM
rigarzatx rigarzatx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 36
'92 300d 2.5 Turbo vs. '95 e300d (no turbo)

Looking into either of these 2.

Both seemed to be well mainatined.

'92 has 167k, '95 has 125k

'92 is about 3.5k cheaper.

Question: will I miss the turbo? In talking to a tech, seems like sans turbo is simplier and has less that could go wrong.

Pros - cons, one way or another?

THANKS.
Reply With Quote