View Single Post
  #7  
Old 11-28-2006, 03:32 PM
tvpierce's Avatar
tvpierce tvpierce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 612
I have no interest in Mercedes products built after '95. They seem needlessly complex, and under-engineered.

Here's an interesting statistic: in '92, my 190E/2.3 was MB's bottom-of-the-line offering. The sticker was $29,000. A bottom-of-the-line 2007 C Class lists for $29,000. Adjust for inflation, and it kinda makes you wonder how MB can 1) sell a car for effectively two-thirds the cost of what their cars sold for 15 years ago, 2) yield a profit and 3) still maintain quality.

The answer:
1) We know what the price is... that's a constant.
2) They have shareholders, so they MUST maintain an acceptable profit.
3) This is the only place to make adjustments to make the numbers work.

Tell your son to hold on to that '93... it's one of the good ones.

Just my 2 cents... arguably worth that.

Jeff Pierce
__________________
Jeff Pierce

Current Vehicles:
'92 Mercedes 190E/2.3 (247K miles/my daily driver)
'93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon (263K miles/a family truckster with spunk)
'99 Kawasaki Concours
Gravely 8120
Previous Vehicles:
'85 Jeep CJ-7 w/ Fisher plow (226K miles)'93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon
'53 Willys-Overland Pickup
'85 Honda 750F Interceptor
'93 Nissan Quest
'89 Toyota Camry Wagon
'89 Dodge Raider
'81 Honda CB 750F Super Sport
'88 Toyota Celica
'95 Toyota Tacoma
'74 Honda CB 550F
Reply With Quote