View Single Post
  #11  
Old 01-23-2007, 12:50 AM
suginami suginami is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern California, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by dakota View Post
Paul-
I don't believe that the .990 was CIS-E. I think it was LH-SFI (and 3.2 liters), but am not positive.

Your statement about the 3.0 L .980/.981 being simpler is probably the case, but those early M104s with ASR/Cruise Control do have an electronic accelerator pedal. It probably isn't exactly the same as that which is on HFM-SFI engines, but I believe it is pretty expensive, too. (I think I have heard they are not even available now.)

Also, BOTH the M104 3.0 liter and 3.2 liter (as well as the 2.8 liter) engines have variable intake cam timing. I suspect that the lower torque curve of the 3.2 liter is a more a product of the cam grind, duration and lift, plus the increased displacement.
I can't comment on the LH-SFI engines, but I know for sure the 104.990 is a CIS-E engine at this is the engine that was in the 300CE from 1990-1992. I am also certain that this engine does not have a throttle actuator, but the same Idle control valve that M103 engines have.
__________________
Paul S.

2001 E430, Bourdeaux Red, Oyster interior.
79,200 miles.

1973 280SE 4.5, 170,000 miles. 568 Signal Red, Black MB Tex. "The Red Baron".
Reply With Quote