View Single Post
  #3  
Old 11-29-2001, 09:17 PM
Benzmac Benzmac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Suwanee, GA, USA
Posts: 4,712
The 98 320's are seemingly good so far. I have seen a pattern failure of the 97 420's related to transmission failure.

The 96 and 97 320's have the old style engine which was a workhorse, but they were mated to the new tranny. The mate was not a good one and I have seen transmission problems with them as well.

I would stick to the 98 and later 210 unless you go with a 96 E300d. It has the early style tranny.

I will add that we own a 96 E300d and it is a wonderful car. It has over 240k miles! Original engine and tranny. (Never been apart, but I have NEVER missed a service!)
__________________
Benzmac:
Donnie Drummonds
ASE CERTIFIED MASTER AUTO TECHNICIAN
MERCEDES SPECIALIST 11 YRS

Last edited by Benzmac; 11-29-2001 at 09:55 PM.
Reply With Quote