View Single Post
  #13  
Old 06-09-2008, 02:05 PM
Dee8go's Avatar
Dee8go Dee8go is offline
Senor User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Arlington, VA
Posts: 7,193
I figured that since the front brakes get most of the wear and tear, that bigger ones there were more important than having them on the back. I don't know what other effect disproportionate brakes would have.
__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century

OBK #55

1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold
Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold
The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold
Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles
2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles
2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles
Reply With Quote