View Single Post
  #5  
Old 05-04-2009, 07:49 PM
panZZer panZZer is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texafornia
Posts: 5,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin View Post
Good grief. Have any of you read the actual statute?

This is the first sentence of the Court's opinion:You think people should be found guilty of violating that statute without evidence that they knew their fake identification belonged to another person? What kind of statutory interpretation is that?

If you want to see some BS, look at what these prosecutors were doing:If that's true, those prosecutors should face ethics charges.
Your opinion is Bull ****, as is anyone who defends the criminal aliens.
They didn't care if they were assuming someone elses identity or not-anyway they knew they were lieing and breaking the law, they have networks here in texafornia where they are told where to purchase bogus drivers liscenses that will fool either the chp or texas athorities until ran thru a computer, and along with a fake ss# they are set to do any buisness needed with untold buisnesses/agencys winking-knowing and accepting it to get their buisness-and noone will go after any of them!

Last edited by panZZer; 05-04-2009 at 07:56 PM.
Reply With Quote