Quote:
Originally Posted by Txjake
like I said all about $$$. either a strong argument for nationalized healthcare or patient's rights (maybe both). no one should be ruined finacially be having to take a procedure that may or may not help them...it certainly is not the government's place to decide that.
|
It should be your choice to undergo a procedure that may or may not help you, healthwise. It should also be your duty to cover whatever obligations that come your way from your choice. Say I had the choice of getting a fixed rate or an adjustable rate loan. Sure, the fixed rate sucks if the adjustable would have gone lower. OTOH, had the adjustable rate gone up, your fixed rate would look good. Pick one and go with it. Choose wisely and be rewarded. Choose poorly and pay the penalty. Just like this case. It might help you if you are the 90% or it might not help you if you are the 10%. Either way, your choice. You should have to pay for it.