Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict
I agree fully. From what I heard chemo is very nasty. No one should be forced to take it even if it may help them. That should be the individual's decision. Now if the boy wanted chemo and the mother was against it, maybe there'd be a reason for the state to get involved, but that's not the case here from the little that I've read about it.
|
Cancer is even worse. The question is whether you want to take a chance or not. Yes, it should be your choice. In this case, the child is a ward of the parents and it should have been their choice, not the state's choice.