Quote:
Originally Posted by Emmerich
Federal appellate experience means little if your opinions are out of touch and biased, as it appears hers are.
|
Really? can you cite any examples? Contrary to Fox News' attempt to portray Sotomayor as a judge who is frequently reversed, her record is actually quite good. Fox claims that she is reversed 50% of the time, but that is not even close to true. According to the White House, she has been reversed about 0.8% of the time.
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/05/beware_the_numbers.php?ref=fpblg
Quote:
|
She comes across as a reverse racist, which *is* a racist.
|
Fox is working that line pretty hard as well. So far, it seems to be falling flat.
Quote:
|
And NOBODY has stated that she has a sharp legal mind, much less than "one of the finest legal minds in America today". John Roberts is so far ahead of her it isn't even funny. From a "legal mind" standpoint, she is the least qualified in decades.
|
Based on what? To come from the housing projects in the Bronx and then excel at Princeton and Yale, I would think that she wouldn't be a total dummy.
Look for Rush, et al., to imply that she only got where she is today by being an hispanic female. He started with it today. He is a racist.
That would be a lot of work. Do you know of a link that has her opinions all assembled in one place?