View Single Post
  #8  
Old 06-21-2009, 07:47 AM
KarTek's Avatar
KarTek KarTek is offline
<- Ryuko of Kill La Kill
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bahama/Eno Twp, NC
Posts: 3,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcounts View Post
Actually wouldn't that be 1.5 L per rev since each cylinder only fires/exhausts every other rev?

However, at 3000 RPMs that's still 4500 LPM, or roughly 159 dubic feet per minute. That's still a fair amount of volume to have to push through a pipe with a cross section of just under 5 square inches (pi x r squared = 3.14159 x 1.25 x 1.25 = 4.91). Whereas with a 3" pipe you're pushing that same 159 cubic feet per minute through a pipe with a cross section of just over 7 square inches (3.14159 x 1.5 x 1.5 - 7.07). While 2.16 square inches difference may not sound like much, it is roughly a 44% increase (2.16 / 4.91 = .4399).

Diesels run best with NO back-pressure at all (as MTUPower said - a vacuum on the exhaust would be better still) so 44% increase in flow area = a 44% decrease in back pressure. Gotta' be some benefit to that - though you'd need to run the 3" all the way to the outlet of the turbo to get the most benefit out of it...
Don't forget that the turbo, putting out 1 bar of boost, will double all your numbers here since it creates "artificial" displacement.

I don't have the spreadsheet on this computer but it calculates the lb/min. of air moved when a given amount of HP is generated.
__________________
-Evan


Benz Fleet:
1968 UNIMOG 404.114
1998 E300
2008 E63


Non-Benz Fleet:
1992 Aerostar
1993 MR2
2000 F250
Reply With Quote