Quote:
Originally Posted by Billybob
From your commentary it's obvious you have thus far chosen to remain ignorant of the factual specifics detailed in the original articles...
|
Pretty much.
Quote:
|
...you would not deny the Ms. Malkin's article is both accurate and complete regarding the factual basis of the events detailed in the articles...
|
There's a first time for everything.
Quote:
|
Maybe the minimum standard ought to be "read before"?
|
I am happy to read things by credible authors. You seem to be falling into the "Fair and Balanced" trap where people are expected to listen to all sides of an argument, even when one side of that argument is made by a snake oil saleswoman like Malkin.
If you posted a political commentary by, say, Pee Wee Herman, I would be expected to read it before cracking any jokes about it? Is that the sort of standard you propose?
I'm still waiting for someone to explain why I should be interested in this story.