View Single Post
  #13  
Old 07-11-2002, 05:41 PM
pentoman pentoman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: England
Posts: 1,841
Quote:
Originally posted by yhliem

by the same token, the 500E is more roomy. I HATE sitting in the back seat of a 190E. too cramped back there.
Heh.. what are you doing sitting in the back?! Shouldn't you be driving!?
I sometimes sit in the back of mine if I'm adjusting audio setup, or fixing something, and you're right there's no room in there. But at least I don't have to drive when I travel with friends.. I hate the extra miles and the sluggish performance with any more than 1 person on board



Ah yes, one more thing I forgot to mention - ride quality. How are the 2 cars? I love my 190's ride - supersmooth and the low mileage means there's no knocks or bangs. I don't mind too much if the car is jostled about a little by changes in height of the road surfaces, but I don't want, say, poorly surfaced roads and other sharp intrusions to come into the cabin. How's the 16v on this?

Jeez I'm starting to sound real 'pernickity' now huh?

later
__________________
190E's:
2.5-16v 1990 90,000m Astral Silver
2.0E 8v 1986 107,000m Black 2nd owner
http://www.maylane.demon.co.uk/190esmall.jpghttp://www.maylane.demon.co.uk/190esmall2.jpg
Reply With Quote