View Single Post
  #14  
Old 07-11-2002, 06:11 PM
yhliem yhliem is offline
Senior Canadian Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 827
I've found the 16v to be more of a "sports sedan" than the 500E and as a result, has a harsher ride while also having more body roll (which can be solved with diferent anti-sway bars).

The 500E, again, was intended as a long distance commuter and has a firm, but more supple ride.

Both understeer when pushed to the limit (which is indicative of MBs conservative approach). But this too can be adjusted through suspension tuning.
__________________
'94 W124.036 249/040 leder; 8.25x17 EvoIIs
'93 W124.036 199/040 leder; 8.25x17 EvoIIs, up in flames...LITERALLY!
'93 W124.036 481/040 leder; euro delivery; 8.25x17 EvoIIs
'88 R107.048 441/409 leder; Euro lights
'87 W201.034 199/040 leder; Euro lights; EvoII brakes; 8x16 EvoIs - soon: 500E rear brakes
'70 R113.044 050/526; factory alloys; Euro lights
Reply With Quote