View Single Post
  #11  
Old 03-15-2010, 02:06 PM
JHZR2's Avatar
JHZR2 JHZR2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by bustedbenz View Post
What am I missing here? Shouldn't connecting an ammeter directly to the + and - of a power source essentially be using the meter as a short-out between the poles (similar to laying a wrench across the battery terminals and producing a welder)? I stuck an ammeter into a household AC power strip one time just out of curiosity and ignorance. The result was that the meter tried to create a dead short between the two prongs, the resultant heat melted my positive meter lead, the power strip (one of those 6-outlet things) was fried instantly and the household breaker tripped. Isn't putting an ammeter across a dc battery causing the same effect (or at the very least, not a reliable measurement) or is this a different principle? If I'm dead wrong here then forgive me for interrupting the thread, but that seems... odd to me, unless I've missed something major. I'm not an electrical person either.

Measuring volts across a battery's + and - I understand perfectly. But I was under the impression that it was impossible to do so on an amp setting.

You are right - battery terminal to terminal is shorted and would blow the ammeter fuse if just touched to both sides.

Ammeter needs to be inline with battery cable, and .4A shouldnt blow it.
__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (113k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
1993 300SD (291k)
1993 300D 2.5T (338k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (265k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K)
1985 300D (233K)
Reply With Quote