I am a believer in SVO as a fuel and I use WVO in my SVO converted vehicles. I follow Dana's advice and agree that the blanket statements made by greasel leave room for doubt.

I must say though, does anyone think that it looks bad to make a public statement with so many spelling, punctuation and usage errors? Granted, Greasel isn't in the editorial business, and if any of you read often, you will see that many editors aren't either.

My point is that there takes a certain attention to detail to make these conversions professionally with long term success. This is EXACTLY what Dana is referring to. I am suggesting that if I were to fluff my feathers and say that "my system works", I had better compose a neat and tidy letter mirroring that same ethic.

__________________
83 300TD (need rear wiper assembly dead or alive)
84 300SD Daily driver
85 300TD almost 400k miles and driven daily.
98 E300D *sold
86 300SDL *sold and made flawless 10 hour journey to new home.