View Single Post
  #10  
Old 08-29-2002, 05:04 PM
yhliem yhliem is offline
Senior Canadian Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 827
Re: AMG EVO II 2.5L-16V

Quote:
Originally posted by Speedtek
The crankshaft was not fully counterweighted. The counterweights were very thin and strange looking.
They looked like blades. I was told this was to reduce drag.
Typically the 2.3/2.5 crank has 8 counterweights on it. in order to reduce inertial mass 4 of these were removed from the EvoII crank.

Less inertial mass requires less energy to rev up and down. this makes it easier/faster for the engine to get to the sweet spot in the powerband. It also helps the engine drop revs faster.

This was all accomplishable because machining technology had gotten to the point where they were able to be far more precise and could afford to 1/2 the number of counterweights
__________________
'94 W124.036 249/040 leder; 8.25x17 EvoIIs
'93 W124.036 199/040 leder; 8.25x17 EvoIIs, up in flames...LITERALLY!
'93 W124.036 481/040 leder; euro delivery; 8.25x17 EvoIIs
'88 R107.048 441/409 leder; Euro lights
'87 W201.034 199/040 leder; Euro lights; EvoII brakes; 8x16 EvoIs - soon: 500E rear brakes
'70 R113.044 050/526; factory alloys; Euro lights
Reply With Quote