View Single Post
Old 10-12-2002, 06:55 PM
suginami suginami is offline
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern California, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,503
The 400E is about a half a second quicker from 0-60 mph, and about a second quicker in the quarter mile.

The acceleration from 50 mph on up will feel enormously faster.

I suppose the reliability and comfort should be about the same, although most of the 94-95 C280's have the engine wiring harness problem, and some of the 92-93 400E's have a similar problem.

The C class is about a 7/8 version of the W124 E-class in size, and will probably handle slightly better due to its lighter weight. The E-class has about an inch more legroom upfront and a bit more in the back seat. Unless you're a big guy, I don't think you'll find the C class to be too small in the front, though.

The C280 engine is a 2.8 liter version of the M104 engine. The 1993 300E 2.8 shares the same engine. The 1993 300E (3.2) / 1994-1995 E320 / 1996-1997 E320 have a 3.2 liter version of this M104 engine.
Paul S.

2001 E430, Bourdeaux Red, Oyster interior.
79,200 miles.

1973 280SE 4.5, 170,000 miles. 568 Signal Red, Black MB Tex. "The Red Baron".
Reply With Quote