View Single Post
  #55  
Old 01-17-2013, 01:56 PM
Walkenvol Walkenvol is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ooltewah, TN
Posts: 707
A classic example of "he's forgotten more than I know".

From my perspective the question still remains is will the 722.414 work properly bolted behind a n/a 2.5. As I said before, the physical dimensions / bolt patterns are the same. My local tranny guy said the turbo model was a "beefed up" version of the 722.413. His opinion was the 722.403, 722.413, and 722.414 were all interchangable and if one were searching for a replacement of a 722.403 or 722.413, that a 722.414 was the best option.

This info is from the local transmission shop and is not being presented as absolute fact and I was hoping someone on the forum with MB tranny expertise could confirm or deny this.

Forum member GregMN reports in this thread Starting my Diesel conversion 2.2 into 87 190E body using a gasser tranny (722.408 or 409) behind his diesel so it might be that all trannys from this era swap with only minor differences or improvements / upgrades differentiate within this tranny family through the years?

I PM'ed GregMN so maybe he will join the discussion.
__________________
You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometime you just might find you get what you need.

Last edited by Walkenvol; 01-18-2013 at 11:32 AM.
Reply With Quote