View Single Post
  #9  
Old 03-05-2013, 12:15 PM
werminghausen werminghausen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Reiner View Post
Martin,

When we discussing symptoms in your last thread about this trans, I made this suggestion (on 2/28/13):

"Should you consider a trans replacement, I think that the first choice would be a 722.0 from the 4.5L version of the 108/109 cars, and which was also used in the W116 and R107 cars. It is much more plentiful (at least in the US) than the 722.2 which you have. I would also try to source it in Europe. You could check with Stretch/Army and Cho. There are some modifications required, the most significant being shortening of the driveshaft (the bell housing is 3/4-1" longer)."

If you are bent on maintaining originality, then rebuild the 722.2 trans, however, replacing with a 722.0 type, will be the more satisfactory solution I think. MB discontinued use of the 722.2 with V8s after your car, and discontinued use with the I6s in mid-1973!
hi Frank,
I did not forget what you said. I just don't know the consequences using a 722.0 trans in my car. Did you say I need to shorten driveshaft etc...and it has only 3 gears starting in 2nd gear. There might be more headaches lurking... I just don't know.
Reply With Quote