Quote:
Originally Posted by tbomachines
Good. I've hit the caps before despite being "unlimited" with them. I'm surprised they didn't simply lose enough business to stop that and still went through to get fined.
Aklim is correct but I think it is more pertinent to the wal-Mart brand plans than anything else. Those are often subcontracted out and get second priority to att, Verizon etc whoever owns the tower.
Sent from an abacus
|
I think people don't bother as much. They just assume "the net is slow" or whatever they call it so why would they blame AT&T when the net is slow?
Kinda why I ask. You see, Verizon, IIRC, used to make that comparison of "We have more cell towers than any other carrier". So if we are all equal, WGAS if you own 5 towers or 50000? So what if your brand has more towers than mine if my customers can piggy back off your towers?