Thread: Pluto Fly By
View Single Post
  #13  
Old 07-18-2015, 03:01 PM
pj67coll pj67coll is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix Arizona. Ex Durban R.S.A.
Posts: 6,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmash View Post
I think when we do simple (relatively) like New Horizons, Pioneer, Voyager.... as opposed to Space Shuttle we do much better and get a much better return on the dollar spent.

Stuff like this is why we need NASA.
I disagree. Actually I do agree that NASA does this stuff brilliantly. And from a pure science perspective unmanned probes are far more cost effective than manned. But it's apples and oranges. Actually more like Apples and rice. Manned space exploration should be directed to returning full time to the moon. We've already been there. It's close, and relatively cheap, and doable, compared to Mars which at this stage in our civilizational development is a ludicrous fantasy.

If we establish a permanently manned lunar base that changes the whole paradigm here on earth. It jump starts a whole new technology rather like air travel did in the last century.

Unfortunately while NASA is still the best by far in solar system exploration, our enemies will outstrip us in space colonization while the US as a society gives up.

- Peter.
__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark
Formerly...
2000 GMC Sonoma
1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021
2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels
1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles.
1984 123 200
1979 116 280S
1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
1971 108 280S
Reply With Quote