Thread: GLK v GL
View Single Post
  #6  
Old 03-16-2021, 10:24 AM
tjts1 tjts1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The slums of Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul roberts View Post
IMO, the PO was smart and fixed and dumped it before anything else went wrong. I still don't see any benefit to owning a post 2006 diesel. People go on and on about the fuel economy, but cost per mile leans to the unacceptable side to me. I work on all of these just about everyday. The GLK is a cheap w204. The GL 320 is, well, a diesel. Any Gl has the pesky airmatic. It doesn't matter if it's all been gone through. It seems like the cycle begins all over after the last part is replaced. If one wants one of their trucks. Just be done with it and get a ML350 with the late 272.
This exactly. You have to be a glutton for pain to try to own any of these. Any money you save on fuel will be lost 10 times over on repairs. The complexity of modern diesels is their undoing.
__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words
Reply With Quote