View Single Post
  #10  
Old 11-03-2003, 11:00 AM
TomJ TomJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Back in Colorado for now
Posts: 1,315
Quote:
Originally posted by P.E.Haiges
TomJ,

"most engines need the filters replaced anyway".

There's a no brainer if I ever heard one. If the engine runs OK at full throttle with no loss of power, it doesn't need the fuel filters changed.

So if we did the above test on 100 cars, how many would not pass the test? If it was not over 90%, it certainly would not be "MOST".

P E H
Here's erubin's statement from above:

Quote:
,"The car runs OK at higher speed with some loss of power."


He also stated it's been 10k miles since a filter change. Hence my conclusion that it could use a new filter, regardless of anything else.

BTW, EVERY (not "most") MB I've EVER pulled parts off of at junkyards had black filters that look orig or at least 5 years old. This is a different crowd, MOST owners of older MB's do NOT change their fuel filters when they should. That's where "most" comes in.
__________________
1984 300D Turbo - 4-speed manual conversion, mid-level resto

1983 300D - parts car

1979 300TD Auto - Parts car.

1985 300D Auto - Wrecked/Parts.


=========================

"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there". Lewis Carrol
Reply With Quote