I hear ya ..
No Problem.
The communication was b/c you asked for a 3rd party info source .. I went through the trouble and personally thought I filled that request to the 'T" [and then some] and did not expect your doubtful reply to include a need for 4th or 5th party after I had supplied the correct info. After re-reading your first post, I can now see that should have been expected , so my oversight.
If you think you got some conflicting source info on the code designations, wait til you see how many one can get when they want the remedy opinions using the codes/combo of codes as a diagnosis basis..
That is where the Experience wins, hands down.
Good Luck to ya and glad you solved your problem.