Has anyone installed this? It extracts hydrogen from water.

I believe there is a somewhat heated discussion about this, in the Diesel discussion.

__________________
It is a truism that almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so. Robert A. Heinlein


09 Jetta TDI
1985 300D

Was going tom do it on my Supra. researched it alot, and found it to be a COMPLETE RIPP OFF.

Will NOT work. Trust me.

__________________
1990 300CE. Garage kept all its life. Looks & Runs Like New. Everything works. White w/Palomino int. Pioneer 12 CD player in the boot. 17" Enkei LX-F Chrome wheels w/Falken Azenis ST-115 225-45 tires. Tinted windows. Black sports grill w/Euro clear front lamps.

My son is planning to install this on his A/C trucks.Can you share your research.

google it like I did. start reading.

P.S. I run a shop, and have been an ASE Master Tech for 25yrs, so......trust me, it won't work.

I have spent a lot of $$$ & time making my Supra (and a whole lot of other cars) go fast. I want the best MPG I can get, as my MB 300CE & Supra only get 20mpg.

__________________
1990 300CE. Garage kept all its life. Looks & Runs Like New. Everything works. White w/Palomino int. Pioneer 12 CD player in the boot. 17" Enkei LX-F Chrome wheels w/Falken Azenis ST-115 225-45 tires. Tinted windows. Black sports grill w/Euro clear front lamps.

HHO is actually a sydonym Dihydrogen oxide, also known as Dihydrogenmonoxide or DHMO. This is an extremely dangerous substance that kills 100's of thousands each year. Thankfully there is a growing awareness of the dangers of DHMO. Details at http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html

__________________
1998 C230 330,000 miles (currently dead of second failed EIS, yours will fail too, turning you into the dealer's personal human cash machine)
1988 F150 144,000 miles (leaks all the colors of the rainbow)
Previous stars: 1981 Brava 210,000 miles, 1978 128 150,000 miles, 1977 B200 Van 175,000 miles, 1972 Vega (great, if rusty, car), 1972 Celica, 1986.5 Supra

Hmmm. Dihydrogen = "H2" and Monoxide = "O". Let's put those together shall we? "H2O"...

That's WATER, folks!


The site listed above is a hoax, albeit a very good one. They managed to get the city council of a small California town to ban the stuff for a while.


Read this link on wikipedia for the full story:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dihydrogen_monoxide_hoax

__________________
"It's not about how fast you can go, but how well you can go fast."

Bob in Richmond

'97 S320 (LWB), Ruby Red Metallic, 73k miles
'97 S420V, Smoke Silver Metallic, 155k miles

Reads like another:It works/it does'nt work.

So you are talking about a perpetual motion machine, right?

Less energy in than created. How much energy is required to release the bonds between H and O? And then how much do you get from the H?

I've seen the picture of the little flame on top of a test tube. That heat would certainly power the battery to cause the separation, right? NOT!

__________________
Thank You!
Fred
2009 ML350
2004 SL600
2004 SL500
1996 SL600
2002 SLK32
2005 CLK320 cabrio
2003 ML350
1997 C280 Sport

You certainly can't run an engine on the HHO that it produces by turning a generator. That would be a perpetual motion machine.

The question is, does introducing a small amount of Brown's gas to the intake stream increase efficiency of the burning gasoline?

This I do not know, but I highly doubt it. To increase the efficiency, you must release less heat. I never see a discussion of heat loss by the purveyors of these devices.

It would still be a perpetual motion machine. It takes energy to release the hydrogen. If it can't create enough energy to do so, then that energy must come from somwhere, the engine's fuel. Thus, fuel being wasted on creating a reaction that produces less power than it produces.

__________________
Thank You!
Fred
2009 ML350
2004 SL600
2004 SL500
1996 SL600
2002 SLK32
2005 CLK320 cabrio
2003 ML350
1997 C280 Sport

I don't see where they are claiming to make hydrogen gas. They are claiming to make "HHO" gas. That has another name: water vapor. You can certainly put water vapor into an engine. It was used to reduce combustion temperatures a long time ago, back in the days of carburetors, that were so bad almost anything could improve them. However, water vapor doesn't burn.

__________________
1998 C230 330,000 miles (currently dead of second failed EIS, yours will fail too, turning you into the dealer's personal human cash machine)
1988 F150 144,000 miles (leaks all the colors of the rainbow)
Previous stars: 1981 Brava 210,000 miles, 1978 128 150,000 miles, 1977 B200 Van 175,000 miles, 1972 Vega (great, if rusty, car), 1972 Celica, 1986.5 Supra