|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Rust Repair 85 300D
My rust free 300D ain't. The rubber grommet for the antenna had long been kaput on this car . I am developing a hole at the rear bottom of the car as a result of this long neglected leak. Should I bite the bullet and have this professionally repaired or can I cut out the bad section, POR-15 the area and use a fiberglass based repair method. I don't know how to weld nor do I have a welding machine.
This is the only area that seems to be having any problems at all. I want to nip it before it creeps into the visible part of the car. Right now, you can only see it if you look for it. The other side is solid with no evidence of any upcoming issues. The only other section needing attention is the front, under the bumper. Years of road debris have sort of sand-blasted this area and a good sanding, rust primer and paint would save it. I intend to keep this car forever. I'm 61, forever won't be too long :-)
__________________
1985 300D 197K - Semi-Daily Driver Diesel 1998 Volvo V70 AWD 226K - Daily Driver 2 1998 Volvo S70 140K - Wife's DD 2003 GMC Sonoma ZR2 Option - Rusty Truck THE BABY 1958 220S Sedan 66K All original, never restored and never will be. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
As for functionality, the POR and fiberglass will work just fine. If you want the car to be "perfect" then cut, weld, body work, and paint is required. It will drive the same either way. I prefer the price of functionality on a driver myself, but its an individual choice.
Good luck!
__________________
You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometime you just might find you get what you need. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Functionality is my goal with judicious preservation as a byproduct. Perfection is generally out of the question, I need to use this car. It's pretty nice as is and to keep it this way will make me happy. I am a perfectionist doing most mechanical things but body work perfection would not be worth the effort for this particular car. at this time anyway.
Thanks
__________________
1985 300D 197K - Semi-Daily Driver Diesel 1998 Volvo V70 AWD 226K - Daily Driver 2 1998 Volvo S70 140K - Wife's DD 2003 GMC Sonoma ZR2 Option - Rusty Truck THE BABY 1958 220S Sedan 66K All original, never restored and never will be. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
After wire brush and POR-15 type system =>
If I were you I'd have a look at epoxy fillers instead of fibre glass. There's a product called nu metal that isn't really metal but as damn hard as it - well it seems like it! This sort of thing is fine to use on parts that don't need any strength.
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver 1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone 1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy! 1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
- Peter.
__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark Formerly... 2000 GMC Sonoma 1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021 2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels 1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles. 1984 123 200 1979 116 280S 1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille 1971 108 280S |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Sheet metal, pop rivets, and seam filler
Then paint Really easy and very strong no welding required Just drilling some small holes Required is a simple pop rivet gun (cheap and some rivets (also cheap) Better and less nasty than POR 15 and fiberglass As well as much less expensive |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Exactly I have been doing this for years except I use thin aluminum flashing from a hardware store. Won't rust, easy to work with, can be cut with a scissor and strong but not structurally strong, then again neither is sheet metal.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|