Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-24-2004, 07:20 PM
lietuviai's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SW WA
Posts: 5,744
Question Anyone park their diesels and went to gassers because of the high price of diesel?

Has anyone parked their diesels because of the high price of diesel fuel? I am about to park my 300D and drive my wife's Tahoe. I'm going to drive the Tahoe when I reach empty on my 300D. I had threatened to do so when the price reached $2.19 but then my 230CE ended up needing new CV axles so I kept driving the 300D even when diesel was up to $2.27 at the cheapest place. Well now it's jumped to $2.39 and that was in just in a week's time. I'm just not going to pay such prices and I'm glad I've got other choices. The Tahoe runs just fine on Reg UL at that's still below $2.00. The Tahoe gets no worse than 17 MPG's and according to my math it's cheaper to drive than the 300D at 25 MPG's. Hopefully the axles will be in this week as promised and I'll be back to driving the 230CE which gets over 25 MPG's. I feel sorry for those of you who don't have other vehicles to drive that run on UL but I commend those of you who are ingenious to convert your oil burners to WVO and not have to rely on the thieves who run the refineries. I'm going to do my research on this forum and elsewhere so I also can run on WVO.

__________________
DJ


84 300D Turbodiesel 190K with 4 speed manual sold in 03/2012
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-24-2004, 08:06 PM
Geezer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 1,316
Not me...

300 mile weekly round trip to Detroit

30 mpg = 10 gal @ $2.25/gal = $22.50 for diesel (300SDL)
15 mpg = 20 gal @ $1.99/gal = $40.00 for regular (Suburban)
25 mpg = 12 gal @ $1.99/gal = $24.00 for regular (Grand Marquis or Sebring)
45 mpg = well, it's too cold for the BMW K1200LT motorcycle anyway.

Looks like it's still Diesel #2 for me.

Best Regards,
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2004, 08:08 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
I'll never understand my corner of the world. For the longest time the price of Diesel was between the prices of mid-grade and premium. Now it's a few cents more than regular.

DJ, I would think the 300D gets twice the mpg of the Tahoe. If so, the price of Diesel would have to be more than twice the price of regular before parking the 300D. Or did I forget to carry the 1?

Sixto
95 S420
87 300SDL
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-24-2004, 08:12 PM
oldnavy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SwampEast MO
Posts: 1,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by lietuviai
Has anyone parked their diesels because of the high price of diesel fuel? I am about to park my 300D and drive my wife's Tahoe. I'm going to drive the Tahoe when I reach empty on my 300D. I had threatened to do so when the price reached $2.19 but then my 230CE ended up needing new CV axles so I kept driving the 300D even when diesel was up to $2.27 at the cheapest place. Well now it's jumped to $2.39 and that was in just in a week's time. I'm just not going to pay such prices and I'm glad I've got other choices. The Tahoe runs just fine on Reg UL at that's still below $2.00. The Tahoe gets no worse than 17 MPG's and according to my math it's cheaper to drive than the 300D at 25 MPG's. Hopefully the axles will be in this week as promised and I'll be back to driving the 230CE which gets over 25 MPG's. I feel sorry for those of you who don't have other vehicles to drive that run on UL but I commend those of you who are ingenious to convert your oil burners to WVO and not have to rely on the thieves who run the refineries. I'm going to do my research on this forum and elsewhere so I also can run on WVO.
Man are you terriable with math. Let's see, you want to park a car that gets 50% better fuel ecconomy then your Tahoe because you are having to pay 20% more for the fuel. $95.60 for MB vs $117.65 using $2.39 for diesel and $2.00 for gas, that roughly $265 more per year for fuel for the Tahoe over the MB.

But don't feel bad most people make the same mistake, including my buddy with 2 master's degree's. He thinks because my wife's VW Jetta TDI is diesel and I pay an average of 10% more for fuel that it cost more to drive it. What's funny he has been on trips with me and knows the car get's 50 mpg vs his car at 26 mpg. I use half the fuel and pay a 10% penality but he can't figure that out for some reason.
__________________
'10 Chrysler T&C Stow-N-Go White. Grandpa's ride.

'13 Chrysler 200 Touring Candy Red. Grandma's ride.

Age and cunning will always over come youth and vigor.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-24-2004, 08:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 8,150
You will spend almost twice as much for fuel with the Tahoe, given that it uses so much more.

Besides, gasoline will be going up more soon, too.

It will be a cold day in the bad place before I swap my 30 mpg + deisels for a 14 mpg (or less) gasser! The TE only gets about 22 mpg, and requires premium to boot, which is more expensive than diesel.

Peter
__________________
1972 220D ?? miles
1988 300E 200,012
1987 300D Turbo killed 9/25/07, 275,000 miles
1985 Volvo 740 GLE Turobodiesel 218,000
1972 280 SE 4.5 165, 000 - It runs!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-24-2004, 08:15 PM
lietuviai's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SW WA
Posts: 5,744
The 300D gets 25MPG's at best becasue of the way I drive it. Usually I'm around 22-23 the Tahoe OTOH gets 17MPG's and as much as 20 on the hwy since I don't have to keep the pedal mashed to the floor. I did the math a few days ago and it came out less to drive the Tahoe.
__________________
DJ


84 300D Turbodiesel 190K with 4 speed manual sold in 03/2012
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-24-2004, 08:35 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
Last week:

420miles / 18.5 gallons @ $2.32 a gallon = about $43! Fuel costs are getting expensive! And for some reason my mileage dropped off last week from 23.5 to 22.5?
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-24-2004, 09:09 PM
vwbuge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Johnstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,116
I went to fill up today and to my horror Diesel was $2.29/gal. That is ridiculous in this neck of the woods. I guess we are all feeling it now. I get just over 20mpg around town in my SD. I park it every winter anyway as it is too nice to run in the salt. (that and it is like a wet noodle in the snow with no posi rear)
My Soob AWD wagon has been sitting all summer. Time to spend a few $$$ and some elbow grease to get her going again. Once tuned she should be good for 25 mpg.
I hope she treats me good as she too has some high miles. (241,000)
__________________
'85 300SD (formerly california emissions)
'08 Chevy Tahoe
'93 Ducati 900 SS
'79 Kawasaki KZ 650
'86 Kawasaki KX 250
'88 Kawasaki KDX200
'71 Hodaka Ace 100
'72 Triumph T100R
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-24-2004, 09:19 PM
84300DT's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mass.
Posts: 2,219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy
Last week:

420miles / 18.5 gallons @ $2.32 a gallon = about $43! Fuel costs are getting expensive! And for some reason my mileage dropped off last week from 23.5 to 22.5?
you lose some efficiency when they change over to winter diesel.
__________________
1984 300D Turbo - 231k....totalled 11/30/07 RIP
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-24-2004, 10:05 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Wakefield, RI
Posts: 2,145
My work truck on an average week:
400miles/18.9mpg=21.16gallonsX$2.39/gallon=$50.57

Coworkers '01 Chevy K2500Hd w/6.0liter gasser:
400miles/14mpg=28.57gallonsX$2.05/gallon=$58.56

Coworkers '01 Toyota Tundra TuRD w/4.7liter gasser:
400miles/15.5mpg=25.80gallonsX$2.05/gallon=$52.89

Advantage: Diesel! They were really screaming when diesel was 20cents cheaper than gas. Gotta do the WVO conversion and really rile them up. RT
__________________
When all else fails, vote from the rooftops!
84' Mercedes Benz 300D Anthracite/black, 171K
03' Volkswagen Jetta TDI blue/black, 93K
93' Chevrolet C2500HD ExCab 6.5TD, Two-tone blue, 252K
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-24-2004, 10:05 PM
Old300D's Avatar
Biodiesel Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,883
With an unconverted vehicle I can still run 5 gallons of WVO with a top off of diesel. This amounts to 33% off the price of diesel per gallon: 10 gallons @ $2.20 divided by 15 gallons = $1.47 per gallon.
__________________
'83 240D with 617.952 and 2.88
'01 VW Beetle TDI
'05 Jeep Liberty CRD
'89 Toyota 4x4, needs 2L-T
'78 280Z with L28ET - 12.86@110
Oil Burner Kartel #35

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b1...oD/bioclip.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-24-2004, 10:16 PM
The Warden's Avatar
Certified diesel nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pacifica (SF Bay Area), CA
Posts: 2,946
I guess g@$ hasn't jumped as much as diesel in much of the rest of the country. Here, as sixto mentioned, g@$ has jumped as much as diesel has, so mpg's are still the main determining factor.

I don't drive my truck nearly as much as I'd like to, but my 300D's been doing well...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-24-2004, 10:24 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Diesel by me is now $2.24, I will have to drive my Saturn as it gets about the same milage in city driving as my 300SD, but it uses 87 octane which is $1.98 at the cheaper stations here.

In the HIghway the Saturn gets 40mpg, the 300SD about 25mpg

What sucks is I need to fill up the 300SD so I don't get condensation in the tank. Same for my truck.
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-24-2004, 10:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: cheeseland
Posts: 275
TDI Jetta - 51 Hwy, 46 City
Diesel has to get way out of hand to park that

My wife always wants to drive the 300D because she likes the looks of it, so we take turns. Besides, I will park it as soon as winter arrives, so we'll drive it while we can. The Acura gets 30 mpg hwy, but it needs premium. Have to start driving that when the snow arrives. By then diesel will probably be back down to regular gas prices
__________________
'85 300D - 206K (sold)
'81 240D - 149K (sold)
'03 Jetta TDI - (sold)
'79 300D - (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-24-2004, 11:13 PM
lorenztl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldnavy
Man are you terriable with math. Let's see, you want to park a car that gets 50% better fuel ecconomy then your Tahoe because you are having to pay 20% more for the fuel. $95.60 for MB vs $117.65 using $2.39 for diesel and $2.00 for gas, that roughly $265 more per year for fuel for the Tahoe over the MB.

But don't feel bad most people make the same mistake, including my buddy with 2 master's degree's. He thinks because my wife's VW Jetta TDI is diesel and I pay an average of 10% more for fuel that it cost more to drive it. What's funny he has been on trips with me and knows the car get's 50 mpg vs his car at 26 mpg. I use half the fuel and pay a 10% penality but he can't figure that out for some reason.
Ditto!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I recieve the same comments and most don't understand the 30-50% mpg premium with diesel automobiles And bonus, diesel was less than gas for a good part of the last year!

It's like, Do environmentalists drive 55....huh?

__________________
'96 C220 138,000mi, '95 E300D 239,000 mi., '87 300TD 214,000mi '88 6.2 Turbo Diesel Chevy Conversion Van 253,000 mi.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page