Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-12-2004, 11:23 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Gainesboro, TN
Posts: 176
On my '77 240D, there is a three wire connector

to the alternator. The small gauge wire goes to the charge light. The two large wires both go to the point on the starter solenoid that the positive connection from the battery ties to. Those two wires at the alternator are tied together inside the case(according to the wiring diagram). What is the theory for two wires rather than one heavier gauge wire?

Thanks,

__________________
Jim

'49 170?(donated to church in Darmstadt '58)
'58 220S(crusher, after '73 fire[San Antonio])
'72 280SE 4.5
'77 240D
'81 300SD
'83 240D parts car
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-12-2004, 01:13 PM
dmorrison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Colleyville, Texas
Posts: 2,695
Mine had the same thing and I recently replaced them with 2 larger wires. Installed a larger amp alternator and wanted the amprage(?sp) carrying capability. The only reason I could think of is safety and reliability of the electrical system. If one wire is damaged or corroded to the point of high resistance the the other one is there.

OR the output of each terminal is 55/2=27.5 amps in the 55 amp unit and the whole 55 amps is required for running the cars electrical system. This way 1/2 of the output is 27.5 amps and with the 2 wires connected you get the full 55 amps.

Who know this may be a lot of bunk, but its the only thing I could think of.
Tend to believe the second theory more than the first. Thinking about the design of the alternator, The second idea is probably correct.

Dave
__________________
1970 220D, owned 1980-1990
1980 240D, owned 1990-1992
1982 300TD, owned 1992-1993
1986 300SDL, owned 1993-2004
1999 E300, owned 1999-2003
1982 300TD, 213,880mi, owned since Nov 18, 1991- Aug 4, 2010 SOLD
1988 560SL, 100,000mi, owned since 1995
1965 Mustang Fastback Mileage Unknown(My sons)
1983 240D, 176,000mi (My daughers) owned since 2004
2007 Honda Accord EX-L I4 auto, the new daily driver
1985 300D 264,000mi Son's new daily driver.(sold)
2008 Hyundai Tiberon. Daughters new car
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-12-2004, 01:57 PM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Leave it to a pilot to theorize and then improve on a troubled design.

I've wondered about myself and I'm sure there's a reason. It may have something to do with the fact that both ends of these two wires are in high heat areas near the exhaust manifold. Maybe MB's folks found that smaller crimp connectors hold up better under such conditions. Of course, if that's so, they may not be correct, because I've had to redo the two connectors on the alternator end a couple of different times.

Merry Christmas
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-12-2004, 02:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,141
Smaller wire bundles are more flexible!


That's got to be the reason- not to fatigue crack.

__________________
Michael McGuire
83 300d
01 vw A4 TDI
66 Chevy Corsa
68 GMC V6 w/oD
86 300E
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page