Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-28-2005, 01:59 PM
DieselBone's Avatar
for the glory.....
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania
Posts: 355
Question going from a 617 to a 603 moving foward???

For my daily drivers, its always been either a 617 300D or 300TD wagon. I have loved this engine, but I wonder if I could do better. Is the inline 6 603 turbo diesel a step ahead of the older 617's???? I have never driven onr, or even heard one run. I guess I'm looking for more power too, but that isn't a big problem. I like the look of the w124 wagons, and the 300D's, and the 300SDL's. I just wanted some opinons to see if it is worth selling the old, and getting something a little newer. From what I heard, the 350's aren't any good, like to bend rods. I did drive an 88 300TE last December, I enjoyed the pep of the 3 liter gas, eventhough it needed a tune-up. I was afraid it would be poor on gas, so I walked away. The handleing of the newer wagon was a little better than my 83..... just let me know what you guys think.

__________________
-Randy Wakefield

1969 220D 4 speed (parts car)
1976 280C
1976 280S
1981 240D 4 speed (parts car)
1982 300D
1983 300TD (Ivory)
1983 300TD (gold)
1985 300TD (gray)
1987 190D 2.5
1970 280SEL (sold)
1977 240D 4 speed (sold)
1974 280 (rusted to death)
---
1927 Chevy 4 door sedan
1938 Chevy 2 door sedan
1950 Willys Jeepster
1955 Studebaker President 4 door
1977 Ford F250
1979 Glastron 17'
1948 John Deere A
1960 John Deere 2010
1979 Satoh S650G
--
2000 Bichon (Doby)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-28-2005, 02:19 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Since I have both engines, I could go on and on about how the 603 is smoother and quieter and burns less fuel than the 617......................

But, I'll let Hattie do that.

Very simply, do you want a simple, durable, and bulletproof engine that will go the distance without too much effort, or do you want somewhat of a primadonna that may or may not have issues with lifter noise, cracked cylinder heads, broken timing chain covers, more difficulty in changing glow plugs, issues with the serpentine belt tensioner, no fuel primer pump, etc.?

None of these will stop the show, but, taken as a group, the 603 requires more attention than the 617. And, not every 603 will develop any or all of the aforementioned issues.

The engine is available in the W126 in 1986-1987. It's a very large vehicle that I would not recommend for city driving to and from the stores.

Your alternative is the 1987 W124 which Dave and others have. It's fast as hell, quite a bit smaller, and gets very good fuel economy to boot.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-28-2005, 02:38 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
And I will Brian.

The 603 is a better engine, it is smoother, gets better mileage, and has more power. The 603 is also IMHO simpler to work on. Also the 603 is first in a line of more modern MB diesels ending in my favorite engine the 606.

Yeah you do have to change the lifters if they make noise, but no valve adjustments.
The vac pumps need to be of the new design or you risk destroying the engine.
Don't overheat one
The trap ox thing is great if you can find a car with one, nothing like free new parts.

But the 603 is just as long lived as the 617 and once the 603 issues are worked out just as trouble free.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-28-2005, 02:55 PM
R Leo's Avatar
Stella!
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: En te l'eau Rant
Posts: 5,393
I have both 617 and 603 also (well, a 616 too ) ...the 603 definitely impresses me. My last tank of fuel was counsumed at a miserly 28something MPG in mixed city/hwy driving and that's 3.0 L yanking 3800lbs of full-sized sedan around. Once the engine is off idle, it goes like a gasser...haven't had to work on mine all that much yet but, it looks like it's no worse than most cars and lots easier than a few I've been intimate with.

My complaint is that my 603 is festooned with sensors and other nonsense that warn you of the crap you really should be checking if you're a halfway responsible driver. But I guess that's part of what made that SDL a 60k-buck car waaay back then.

Oh, and there's nothing like that 603 howl at 4500RPM.
__________________
Never a dull moment at Berry Hill Farm.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-28-2005, 03:49 PM
WANT '71 280SEL's Avatar
I'll Go Upside Your Head!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,378
From my experience with similar mileage, etc. The 603 starts better in the cold. However, once the 617 is started it doesn't smoke, etc.

Yes, I am speaking about a well-taken care of 617 with proper valve lash. my brother's 190D (with a 601, which is a 603 minus 2 cylinders) starts like a gasser at 10F and it has 375k miles or somewhere in the ballpark.

I made the jump and haven't looked back. Of course the 617 is easier to work on, until you have to do a rear crank seal on both!

Thanks
David
__________________
_____________________________________________

2000 Honda Accord V6 137k miles

1972 300SEL 4.5 98k miles

_____________________________________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-28-2005, 04:38 PM
d.delano's Avatar
Dönerkebap
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 1,466
I heard 124s have some expensive deferred maintenance things to deal with. Like something within the climate control system that costs 1800 bucks(I want to say evaporator, but not sure). Weak oil pump chain, or am I thinking about a different engine? I remember a post from Larry lamenting the costs of the 124. I'd love to have one, to be honest. I think they look like a Mercedes, athletic and austere. Nice cars, really, nothing matches the interior layout, except for maybe the old 116s. Like I said I'd love to have one, but I haven't completed my initiation to MB diesels yet with my 9 months of ownership and maybe 3k miles on my 123. I'm still a squier and haven't mastered what I've got.
__________________
'02 BMW 325i
'85 300D 450k
'93 190E 2.6 170k(killed by tree)
'08 Ducati Hypermotard 1100S 6k
'06 Ducati S2R800 14k(sold)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-28-2005, 04:57 PM
BusyBenz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Both are good, both have strengths and weaknesses, both will bloody your knuckles, and both can run as smooth as a sewing machine, but both will still billow thick black smoke, and have you smelling like the oil man every time you spill or splatter diesel while pumping it into your tank!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-28-2005, 10:46 PM
DieselBone's Avatar
for the glory.....
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania
Posts: 355
Thumbs up

Thanks a lot for all the replys. I would like to find a 300TD 603, but I think I might have trouble finding a good one. I have always liked the big body 126's. So it looks like I might start a hunt for one of them.
__________________
-Randy Wakefield

1969 220D 4 speed (parts car)
1976 280C
1976 280S
1981 240D 4 speed (parts car)
1982 300D
1983 300TD (Ivory)
1983 300TD (gold)
1985 300TD (gray)
1987 190D 2.5
1970 280SEL (sold)
1977 240D 4 speed (sold)
1974 280 (rusted to death)
---
1927 Chevy 4 door sedan
1938 Chevy 2 door sedan
1950 Willys Jeepster
1955 Studebaker President 4 door
1977 Ford F250
1979 Glastron 17'
1948 John Deere A
1960 John Deere 2010
1979 Satoh S650G
--
2000 Bichon (Doby)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-01-2005, 12:00 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
Getting a 603 to smoke is kind of hard. Mine will only blow a decent little cloud if I idle it around town for a week or so and then run it up to 4.8k rpm. I never see any soot on my bumper or on the driveway where I park.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-01-2005, 01:49 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kansas City, MO, USA
Posts: 1,213
Well, there's no true negative to state about owning a 617, which is why I won't ever leave it. No issues with over heating, you can actually overheat this sucka and get away with it within reason. No vacuum pump crap. No serpentine belt tensioner issues, no valve lifter noises, etc. The 617 requires valve adjustments, though I'm past due for a valve adjustment yet I still average 24mpg between city and highway driving, there's no reduction in power and no increase in the amount of smoke from the exhaust.

If I have the chance to purchase and own an SDL I will, but never at the expense of giving up my 300SD.

__________________
1999 Mercedes-Benz S600, 103K miles - garage queen
1988 Mercedes-Benz 560SEL, 89K miles - daily driver
2007 Hyundai Sonata Limited, 31K - daily driver
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
swap from 617 to 603? hotskillet Diesel Discussion 29 07-26-2005 02:28 PM
Diesel OM 603 Roll Call OhioSDL Diesel Discussion 45 02-25-2005 12:30 PM
617 -vs- 603 prefilters Dave Epperson Diesel Discussion 0 11-16-2004 06:06 PM
Alloy heads on a 617? and other engine lineage questions The Warden Diesel Discussion 6 04-11-2003 02:04 PM
Delvac1 users with 603 or 617 - how often do you change oil? surfblau Diesel Discussion 5 02-27-2003 10:13 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page