|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What's the Difference Between an 82 & an 84 300D?
I *heard* that 84 is the best year for these cars but now I've got my eye on a sweet silver one that's an 82...
__________________
Jeff ___ 1982 300D Turbo 150K PlantDrive Single tank WVO conversion 6000 veggie miles and counting! ----------- 1985 Ford F250 - 132K PlantDrive Two-tank WVO conversion 15,000 veggie miles and counting... Driving for FREE! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The difference is mostly small interior changes. On the 84, (1983-1985 actually) the seat patterns are slightly different, with narrower pleats, and the front seatbacks are intented for more rear seat knee room. Also, the speedometer reads 120mph instead of 85mph, the passenger side exterior mirror is power adjustable, both front sunvisors have illuminated mirrors, and the front dome light has a time-delay function.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Roughly two years. Give or take.
__________________
1984 300D Turbo - 4-speed manual conversion, mid-level resto 1983 300D - parts car 1979 300TD Auto - Parts car. 1985 300D Auto - Wrecked/Parts. ========================= "If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there". Lewis Carrol |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I've heard the 85 is the one to get, due to the different final drive ratio in the rear end for lower RPMs at highway speed.
__________________
Cannondale ST600 XL Redline Monocog 29er 2011 Mini Cooper Clubman 2005 Honda Element EX www.djugurba.com www.waldenwellness.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Adam Lumsden (83) 300D Vice-President of the MBCA International Stars Section |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The 85 model also had the trap oxidizer and that alone would discourage me from buying the car unless it was really pristine. rg2098, I guess your credit union is going by the Blue Book values. The BB only covers cars up to 20 years old.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual) Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Only the CA versions of the 85's had the trap ox as far as I know.
__________________
1985 300D Turbo ~225k 2000 F350 (Powerstroke) 4X4, SWB, CC, SRW, 6spd ~148k 1999 International 4900, DT466e (250hp/660 ft/lbs), Allison MD3060 ~73k |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah you're right, but since California has always been the biggest market in the US for MB, most 85's are probably the CA version.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual) Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Best "bang for the buck" is probably an '84, for the simple fact that everyone seems to think the '85's are the best - and that drives up the prices.
I agree with the comments about trap oxidizers. I'd shy away from an '85 with the California emissions equipment and favor the '84 or '83. - Patrick
__________________
1982 240D. 198k, Marine Blue/Blue, 4 Speed, Crank Windows, No Sunroof, No Rust, No Oil Leaks 2001 TDI. 197k, Lagoon Blue/Black, 5 speed, Chip, G60/VR6 |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
get an '84, then swap out differentials and speedos with those from an '85....youll be sitting sweet then...
__________________
1985 300SD 192,000miles...Astral silver/ Grey MbTex 1983 300D 194,000miles...White/Tan MbTex...my newest addiction |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Not much difference 82 - 84
I have had one of each(still have '82). Virtually no difference that matters. Some are listed above - another is different tach pick up & amplifier arrangement. 82 has sensor at front of engine and amplifier on lh front wheel well. 84 pick up at rear of engine, no amplifier.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I would prefer an well-documented '81, or 82 over a questionable '85. All theses cars are M-B. There may be minor changes year to year, but they are all Mercedes.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for your replys.
Well I did it & I now have two 300D's. Plan to sell the '84 as the '82 is well-documented (all receipts since 85) and had been well serviced and in better overall cosmetic condition. Plus I got a prety killer deal. It's not as quick 'off the line' as they say, as the 84 - which always impressed the hell out of me on that car (ever since I adjusted the ALDA... whoa!). There's a little bit of oil leaking on the 82 (from the crank pulley? nothing that I can see from above, only underneath) but nothing that really makes a mess in the driveway. It was kind of a no-brainer which one to keep but I had developed some attachment to the 84.
__________________
Jeff ___ 1982 300D Turbo 150K PlantDrive Single tank WVO conversion 6000 veggie miles and counting! ----------- 1985 Ford F250 - 132K PlantDrive Two-tank WVO conversion 15,000 veggie miles and counting... Driving for FREE! |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
'85 300D's like most other modles has year specific transmissions and a different turbo setup........something to remember.
__________________
Proud owner of .... 1971 280SE W108 1979 300SD W116 1983 300D W123 1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper 1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel 1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified) --------------------- Section 609 MVAC Certified --------------------- "He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
difference in engine between 87 190D 2.5t and 90s 300D 2.5? | sixto | Diesel Discussion | 2 | 09-29-2004 06:41 PM |
Old 300D Performance | coldwar | Diesel Discussion | 3 | 09-29-2004 01:20 PM |
1980 300D into 1982 240D AND I NEED HELP! | oilslick | Diesel Discussion | 21 | 12-06-2003 09:37 PM |
Should I sell the old trusted 84 300d for an 87 300d | The Bob | Diesel Discussion | 29 | 08-10-2003 05:48 PM |
1987 300D poor acceleration | mb2003 | Diesel Discussion | 4 | 03-21-2003 10:58 PM |