Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-01-2005, 11:08 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 121
Intake Filter/Terminal Velocity Test

I followed the thread last week on the KN filter deal, thought I'd try a crude test. On my '84 sedan, 250k + well maintained miles. Uncorked the turbo by removing the entire intake assy., found a straight stretch of highway and ran WFO for several miles, slight upgrade, top speed 108 - 109 mph.

Replaced the whole intake assy.,, with new filter, ran again on ther same streath, top speed approx. the same.

What does this tell me? Not much really, I mean top speed is probably more dependant on rear end gearing than anything else. Also, I expected the turbo to emit a cool whine. Instead, it sounds lake an industrial weed eater with an attitude! Think I'll leave well enough alone.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-01-2005, 12:26 PM
pberku's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great Boob
.....Think I'll leave well enough alone.
Smart move. If it ain't broke don't fix it.

Phil
__________________
'95 E300 Diesel, 264,000 Miles. [Sold it]

Last edited by pberku; 08-01-2005 at 02:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-01-2005, 01:45 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,627
well

i think it proves that your stock intake is not an impediment to top speed. which doesn't surprise me.

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-01-2005, 06:52 PM
Johnhef's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Frederick, Md
Posts: 4,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by pberku
Smart move. If it ain't broke don't fix it.

Phil
If it ain't broke, fix it till it is.
I've got the cheaper ebay kit on mine, what junk. If I could only remember where I put my stock intake bracket and box i'd be back in business.
__________________


1980 500SE/AMG Euro
1981 500SEL Euro
1982 380SEL
1983 300TD
1983 500SEC/AMG Euro
1984 500SEC
1984 300TD Euro
1986 190E 2.3-16
1986 190E 2.3
1987 300D
1997 C36 AMG
2003 C320T 4matic

past: 1969 280SE 4.5 | 1978 240D | 1978 300D | 1981 300SD | 1981 300SD | 1982 300CD | 1983 300CD | 1983 300SD | 1983 380SEC | 1984 300D | 1984 300D | 1984 300TD | 1984 500SEL | 1984 300SD | 1985 300D | 1986 300E | 1986 560SEL | 1986 560SEL/Carat | 1987 560SEC | 1991 300D 2.5 | 2006 R350
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-01-2005, 08:11 PM
home of 4,5,6,8 cylinders
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 504
Filter or not will not change your terminal velocity, but less air restriction will help your acceleration.
Stock air filter can't be all that bad, may not be the best, if they can design the whole car, the engineer can't be that dumb.

U need so much surface area to allow so much air cubic foot per min to pass thru.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-01-2005, 09:15 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,627
i am

wondering how it could affect acceleration and not top end? top end must require the max power. why would acceleration be affected differently?

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-01-2005, 09:38 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth
wondering how it could affect acceleration and not top end? top end must require the max power. why would acceleration be affected differently?

tom w
lower restriction = quicker spoolup = faster acceleration....

even if the higher restriction filter provided enough air to reach max power, the lower restriction would edge it on the spoolup issue and therefoire the acceleration...

But its splitting hairs in all actuality...these cars aren't that quick and a 1/2 second faster acceleration really isn't going to matter a hill of beans.
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-01-2005, 09:50 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,627
i have yet

to see any evidence of lower restriction.

i think that the k&n is a good product, high quality i mean, and it works for many cars which are limited by air cleaner size. i am not convinced that the mb is air cleaner restricted. the test above in first post is good evidence of it.

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-01-2005, 10:18 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have to wonder if the (small) advantage of these aftermarket air cleaners is offset by relocating the air intake to the engine compartment. The stock air cleaner has a cold air inlet. Most of the aftermarket setups I've seen have a K&N type filter installed near the turbo. The air in that area must be 20 F hotter than ambient. I suspect the temperature effect is greater than the pressure drop effect. I also find it hard to believe that the inlet pressure drop would affect the turbo spin-up time significantly. I would expect the rotating inertia of the turbo to be the limiting factor. Just my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-01-2005, 10:19 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth
to see any evidence of lower restriction.

i think that the k&n is a good product, high quality i mean, and it works for many cars which are limited by air cleaner size. i am not convinced that the mb is air cleaner restricted. the test above in first post is good evidence of it.

tom w
That was top speed.....all that proves is the engine got enough air...

but that can still be enough to slow spoolup a bit...and acceleration...

But without some sensitve instruments to measure .......the butt dyno isn't accurate enough.

THe turbo does spool at a lower RPM with the aftermarket airfilter setup...

but like I said...that helps drivability a little...but differences are not dramatic..and arguing the point is like splitting hairs...

just like arguing if Delo 400 oil is better than Mobil one.

__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M103 Emission Test Insight Duke2.6 Tech Help 5 06-10-2006 12:16 AM
Who can read those Sun Test Statistics? mrsilico Tech Help 6 07-31-2005 09:57 PM
Glow plug change - intake manifold jksoft Diesel Discussion 0 11-15-2004 09:01 AM
Oil in the air intake? Bad turbo seals? Hatterasguy Diesel Discussion 8 10-18-2004 09:27 PM
1990 300SL Instrument Cluster Problem waynesworld Tech Help 28 10-10-2002 11:30 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page