|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Automatic Transmission "Downshift" Engine Braking
Hi, I have my 82 300SD and was just scared crapless at the price of a full set of brakes (rotors, pads, caliper rebuilds all the way around.) I got them from Rusty though, so that saved me some cash....
Anyhow, I have found a way to save my brakes, when coming to a stop sign, corner, etc, I let off the gas pedal at the same time as normal, then after I hit about 50 mph, I kick the shift lever from D to S and allow engine braking to slow me. I then lightly apply brake to peal off about 10 mph of speed from 40 to about 28-30. I then kick shift all the way to L and apply brakes, bringing myself to a nice stop, without using the brakes to drag myself down. My question is, is this hard on my Tranny? I wouldn't think that the engine braking itself would be, but does the "manual" downshifting used to accomplish this feat detrimental to the tranny's health? If so, I wont do this anymore as brakes are free compared to transmission costs. Thanks guys!
__________________
-Matt EPA Section 609 Certified MVAC Technician ----------------- Oil Burner Kartel Member #10 Ahh the smell of Diesel Fuel, it's like coffee in the morning! My Car: 1982 300SD Turbo Diesel (231,500 miles!) RIP 1984 300SD Turbo Diesel Custom (235,500 mi on driveline.) - On Road!! www.icsrepair.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
You will hear various opinions.
Mine: It will cause some additional wear to the friction materials in the transmission, but your car will probably be scrapped or retired for some other reason, such as terminal rust or an accident, before you wear out the transmission. Your mileage may vary... Best Regards, Jim |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
If it was me I'd much rather continue replacing front pads and rotors into the future than add all that wear to the tranny, it even says in the car's manual not to use the tranny as an engine brake, it causes additional wear and heat buildup. A tranny costs WAY more than brakes......pads are like $30 a set for the front....and the rotors maybe $50apeice? That should last years....a tranny is thousands. I've had the same rotors and pads over a year now, I still have 60% of the pads, and probably 80% of the rotors left, and I brake a lot, mostly city driving, and at high speed (55mph), so I don't worry about it. Also, its only the front brakes that will wear out, the rear ones last forever.
All in all I'd just go by what the manual says and not use it for engine braking....
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life- '15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800) '17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k) '09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k) '13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k) '01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km) '16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
You have, no doubt, heard the saying "Penny wise and pound foolish." Saving your brake pads could be a very expensive proposition.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I used to downshift a lot when coming to a stop. I don't do it anymore, although I have no idea why I discontinued the practice....actually that just occurred to me.
__________________
1982 240D. My name is Michael, and I am an 18 year old binge-drinkin', cigar-smokin', novel-writin', all around unsavory and unnattractive guy. I tell long-winded stories, and I only shave once a week, although I've had to do it every day since I was 16. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Unless something is wrong with your brakes, the usual cause of excessive brake pad/disk wear is driving style. If you want to get on it hard and brake hard, something has to wear, i.e. your brakes. Why not plan ahead and let the engine (in top gear) slow you down a bit and then only use the brakes for the final slow to stop? I wouldn't shift down to slow the car. That was normal before good brakes were available, but isn't really justifiable now.
Of course, if you prefer to drive aggressively, you get to pay the price. My pads on the '82 300D last about 80k to 100k miles. (And I'm seldom late to an appointment either.....) Wes |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
thanks guys!
No, I'm not an "agressive" driver really. I was only using the tranny to slow me because I thought "what the heck, if it is free braking, then might as well use it". BUT.........if it is hard on the tranny, I will discontinue the practice immediately. I'd like to keep this tranny in this car for good, and I plan on keeping this car unless a total-destruction wreck takes it from me. As it is my first car, I'd love to keep it and maybe restore it some day in the future, might make a great family heirloom.
thanks for the input!
__________________
-Matt EPA Section 609 Certified MVAC Technician ----------------- Oil Burner Kartel Member #10 Ahh the smell of Diesel Fuel, it's like coffee in the morning! My Car: 1982 300SD Turbo Diesel (231,500 miles!) RIP 1984 300SD Turbo Diesel Custom (235,500 mi on driveline.) - On Road!! www.icsrepair.com |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
These cars slow significantly just leaving them in the highest gear "D"....especially from speeds 45 or greater. If your driving 35 or below, just drive around all the time in "S" then it will slow you down even more when you let off the pedal. In residential areas of 25-35mph I often don't use overdrive, there's not really much point, plus the added drag/braking effect of being in third gear does help save on brake usage....
Our stupid minivan is a different story, if the surface is level or even a slight grade, its speed INCREASES as it rolls along, even if you don't touch the pedal, thus requiring braking on occassion, and complete brakes to slow from whatever speed. Needless to say, when its driven as a Daily Driver it eats a set of pads and rotors once every 1.5 years or so. Good thing its not a daily driver for us... Oh yeah, check engine light on again too....
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life- '15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800) '17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k) '09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k) '13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k) '01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km) '16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k) |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
What I like about these cars is when you're in a traffic jam, you don't have to hit the brakes all of the time, just tap the accelerator pedal a tad, and let off and it'll slow down, when it moves, tap the accelerator again, and when it slows down, it starts slowing down like the brakes are on, in a gasser, I'd be constantly on the brakes. That's one way to save brakes. Another way is when I'm getting off of the freeway, I just let it coast down to speed, and when it coasts down to say, 45-40, I start braking. It works very well on those freeways that are depressed below ground and the offramp is an incline, in situations such as those, I'll just coast nearly all the way to the intersection and hit the brakes when it hits 30.
__________________
'81 MB 300SD, '82 MB 300D Turbo (sold/RIP), '04 Lincoln Town Car Ultimate Sooner or later every car falls apart, ours does it later! -German Narrator in a MB Promotion Film about the then brand new W123. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Same here! I love that feature.....our gasser van can go up those incline ramps and barely lose 10mph!! Its very annoying....especially if I drive it and I've been driving mine a long time.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life- '15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800) '17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k) '09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k) '13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k) '01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km) '16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k) |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
In the "How to Keep your Volkswagen Alive a Manual of Step by Step Prodecedures for the Complete Idiot" it specifically mentions this topic.
Even with auto tranny expensive mercedes, the idea still applies. Brakes are WAY cheaper than almost ANY component of the drive train system. My concern would not be with the transmission so much as the drivesaft rubber joints. Those thing do not take abuse so well. (and they are SPENDY!) I eat brakes up fast but ya know...I drive really fast and brakes a cheap and easy to replace I figure its not worth shocking my engine at every stop sign. Now when it comes to the occasional downshift for a hill or 100mph-0mph stop...then I will usually try to give the brakes a break rather than use them for all the load. After you drive a car with crap brakes you know when you are abusing them and just merely using them |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS 1982-300SD Engine & Transmission | jim16671836 | Mercedes-Benz Used Parts For Sale & Wanted | 3 | 06-03-2005 11:35 AM |
300D non-turbo engine, transmission | Joseph Bauers | Mercedes-Benz Used Parts For Sale & Wanted | 1 | 05-10-2004 01:21 PM |
Automatic Transmission Fluid E230 | BlackMB77B704XM | Tech Help | 0 | 09-23-2003 10:32 PM |
Is this true? Moisture and MBZ Automatic Transmission Shift Handle | haasman | Tech Help | 6 | 05-30-2003 03:14 PM |
M116 removal from 82 380SL | rstarkie | Tech Help | 3 | 11-14-2002 07:03 AM |