|
|
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You have to be thick skinned to work around these guys.
__________________
Proud owner of .... 1971 280SE W108 1979 300SD W116 1983 300D W123 1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper 1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel 1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified) --------------------- Section 609 MVAC Certified --------------------- "He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Well, this tread has generated the predictable results.
Seriously, there is no "bad language" that is going to offend me, or that I haven't been hearing (and using) since elementary school. Personally, I find the whole concept of "bad words" a little silly (with the obvious exception of derogatory names directed at people or groups). However, I try to refrain from using such language unless I'm sure everyone present is going to be comfortable with it. I have also found that it is much more effective when used sparingly. I generally refrain from using this language in public forums because it is likely to offend someone, and I have no interest in offending others. That said, I do not feel it is my place to tell others what to do. If others chose to express themselves in that manner, that's their business and I'm not going to be the one who tries to censor them. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
George Carlin said it perfectly:
"There is absolutely nothing wrong with any of those words in and of themselves. Their only words. It's the context that counts. It's the user. It's the intention behind the words that makes them good or bad. The words are completely neutral. The words are innocent. I get tired of people talking about bad words and bad language. Bull****! It's the context that makes them good or bad. The context. That makes them good or bad. For instance, you take the word "N----r." There is absolutely nothing wrong with the word "N----r" in and of itself. It's the racist a-hole who's using it that you ought to be concerned about." -edited fot "content" by me. |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
When I moved to D.C., I had to adjust a bit to the strict dress code that permeates many organizations (not all, I often see Congressional staffers in flip-flops, etc., when representatives are not in town). When I was on assignment on the west coast (Seattle), I walked into my first meeting with the regional office in my D.C. attire and found myself sitting among t-shirts and jeans. Well, let me tell you...our regional office in Seattle kicks butt. There's no better office for dealing with our issues then that crew. I'm not saying that it isn't courteous to dress professionally for clients, etc., but the proof is in the pudding and means more in the end. There is some truth to what you say, but I don't believe it's as paramount as you suggest...rather it's marginal. As to vocabulary....I often type so fast on these forums and I'm half awake (maybe with a couple of beers in my system), that I often make spelling and grammar mistakes. I would never sumbit writing like that on the job, or if I did I'd be rewriting it immediately upon it being passed back. I guess what I'm saying is that some judgment by way of perception can be a good thing, but too much can make you miss the value of people and their ideas, ironically rendering your initial judment moot. Yes, it would be a better world if people communicated more succinctly, and didn't obfuscate their message with poor grammar, and yes it would be nice if people showed showed more respect in their attire--but concurrently, it would be a FAR better world if people were more concerned about the inner-value of each other and judged themselves before judging others. My two cents. Pete. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Well at lest we don't use words like "spark plug" or Renault around here.
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Well at least we don't use words like "spark plug" or Renault around here.
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
personally i have different feelings about this issue. but one i stand firm on... if people dont want others to say "g*d d*mn it" or "f*ck" than those accusing shouldnt say "gosh danget" or "fricking" its the same thing. so either you have to do with it all, or just except it.
__________________
my name is rachelle and i have aquired a '75 240D. i received the car shortly after my grandfather's passing away. it was one of many of his mercedes. it has been a great car, and has taught me a ton. never take life too seriously... |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Certainly we browse and contribute to sites about old diesels, but let me tell you this place is much cleaner then the halls of high school.
__________________
Adam Lumsden (83) 300D Vice-President of the MBCA International Stars Section |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Pete, I think you missed my point. If you re-read what I wrote about style and dress, you will notice the next sentence which says," Or vice-versa.
I was trying to point out that the behavior where some people feel the need to do the opposite of everyone else is doing. I think the profanity is an attempt to stand out and be noticed. I can tell the difference between occasional typos and borderline illiteracy. I am clearly not prudish, not even religious, but to me the need to use profanity in a public forum is just says something about the poster. It's exactly the same way I feel went out to eat at a restaurant. Two young guys or girls at the next table using language that is offensive to the other people around them. In my experience it's mostly teens to 20 somethings. They don't give a rip who hears it. Parents with young kids, older folks, religious folks. I mean it is just plain rude. I feel embarassed that people are being forced to hear this stuff. To me a forum like this is just like the restaurant. Do what you want in private. In public, behave like you are in public. Steve |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Point taken. I guess I'm a little bit sensitive about dogmatic dress codes :-)
Pete. |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
You can do what I do...avoid those threads. Any thread that has all the #(*@&$ stuff in it I skip right over. To me excessive cursing is indicative of a poor vocabulary or lack thereof. They can put whatever they want in the titles but I've read that the senior members here skip over them often as well, so, live and learn. Next time you want my advice, show some class.
Thanks David
__________________
_____________________________________________ 2000 Honda Accord V6 137k miles 1972 300SEL 4.5 98k miles _____________________________________________ |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Oooh....you're good. Very good. That'll probably curb bad language in titles faster than just about anything. Pete. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
1983 300-D turbo 1985 300-D turbo 1959 Harley Panhead chopper 1929 Ford coupe restored I hang out with Boneheaddoctor at Schuman Automotive OBK#5 All liberals are mattoids but not all mattoids are liberal. |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
What the $^#&% is going on here?
Just for curiosity, is that really swearing? $^#&% ? I posted it, and I don't even know what it means! Ok, I'm going home.
__________________
1991 GMC Sonoma Ext Cab w/Isuzu diesel (converted March Mar 2003) - sold 1994 S10 Ext Cab w/Isuzu diesel (converted Mar 2008) 1998 Toyota Sienna XLE B6100HST Kubota CUT DIESEL 1994 S10 with Isuzu diesel and 5spd http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...S15/SigPic.jpg |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Wow....did I open a can of worms or what? I never said I was "offended" by the implied words, only that I questioned their place in a forum such as this. How many of us would stand up in the mixed company of a public forum and start a sentence with, "Where's the F___ing water coming from?" or "WTF happened to my......???"
Barking out a curse word when the wrench slips off and you bash your knuckles is one thing. Deliberately typing and posting such words to be read by an unknown audience is another.
__________________
1983 300SD "Helga" |
Bookmarks |
|
|