|
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I know I saw PCV somewhere for these cars. Maybe it was in the Haynes manual. In the FSM they just call it "crankcase ventilation". Blowby gasses/oil vapors are created under the pistons and directed upwards where the oil is usually reclaimed and the gasses are fed into the air intake or vented to the outside. The 617 has an oil seperator in the aircleaner that feeds back into the oil pan via a tube. At the end of the tube is a check valve that keeps oil vapors from getting sucked out of the pan by the air intake. (I don't know if blowby gasses can get into the lower oil pan. I wouldn't think so, normally, but if so then it is possible that people with very low blowby have a broken check valve so that all their blowby gasses are escaping into the air intake via this drain tube.) The 603 has the oil seperator inside the valve cover and it also has a pressure regulator valve that vents the blowby to the outside via a little hole in the valve cover if the blowby pressure is too high. Given this, I would expect to SEE more blowby in a 617 since none of the oil has been reclaimed as it exits through the vent tube. On the 603 I would expect to see less since the vapor goes through the oil seperator before being vented AND the pressure regulator controls the amount of blowby gas that is vented into the air intake. Neither engine neccessarily has more or less blowby in terms of positive gas pressure from the crankcase that needs to be vented, though. One may just be more visible than the other. That's why I asked if you did the other tests. Your vapor could be miraculously free of oil (as I wish mine were so my aircleaner wasn't so oily ). In this case, you wouldn't see it as much, but it still could be there. Have you tried plugging the vent hole? And did it run a very long time? If so, then I would say that truly IS no blowby. But what does that mean for an engine that was designed with blowby/PCV in mind? I don't really know. You said your CD has more blowby but better performance. It just seems like, if these engines were designed to ventilate the crankcase pressure via the vent hose, and you are not seeing this, then either your engine is producing no crankcase pressure or it is being vented somewhere else. Please take this for what it is worth, though, as it has come from a noob. I could just be trying to justify my "moderate" blowby.
__________________
Jackson 1984 300d 223k 1994 Jeep Cherokee 2.5L 88k "She may not look like much, but she's got it where it counts, kid. I've added some special modifications myself." -- Han Solo "Would it help if I got out and pushed?" -- Princess Leia |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Bah
You got me depressed DG! Mine has some smokiness coming out, don't know if its bad or not..the engines starts without a heater always, and doesn't really burn a noticeable amount of oil.
Weird, now you got me all scared
__________________
http://www.betten.mercedescenter.com...n_banner_1.jpg 1976 300D 190,000 Miles Colorado Beige 1975 300D Parts Car 78,000 Miles Rustbucket Also Colorado Beige 1984 190D 2.2 (Dad's) 156,000 miles Champagne Metallic Clearcoat |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Your engine is perfectly healthy then, no being depressed!
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life- '15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800) '17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k) '09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k) '13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k) '01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km) '16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Actually I don't know enough about engines to say that, really, but I've read accounts here from several people who claim their cars have run for tens of thousands of miles at least in spite of fairly copious blowby. Just like pawoSD said about his car. DG, please keep us updated on your drag racing project. In fact, if you ever posted a video of an old diesel Benz spanking a ricer, I'm sure it would be quite popular. Probably not with the guy in the Honda, though. My car doesn't have any visible blowby, either. If I put some saran wrap over the filler hole it actually sucks in a little. If I just leave the cap off with the engine idling a little bit of oil does shoot out the hole, leaving small droplets on the valve cover. I didn't realize it before I read this thread but I guess that means I do have a little blowby. The engine moves quite a it, too, though, so I don't know... My engine was rebuilt 116K ago.
__________________
Ralph 1985 300D Turbo, CA model 248,650 miles and counting... |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Diesel Giant, did you do this test with the engine cold? According to my observation, whether any vapor comes out of the oil fill hole depends on the engine temperature, type of oil used and outside weather condition. With a hot engine you'll get some vapor coming out even with the engine off. Whether droplets of oil are thrown out will also greatly depend on the engine temperature. IMO a better way to evaluate blowby is to just loosen the oil cap, eliminate engine vibration as a factor by changing the engine speed, and look for any motion of the cap, but even that is not a very accurate test as blowby gases are vented through the breather hose. The best test afterall may be cold-starting ability.
BTW, I had a brief look at your power steering service pictorial. Recently I came up with a more complete way to change the fluid and that is after sucking out the reservoir, suck out any remaining fluid in the system through the low-pressure hose using the correct MityVac adapter. You will have to bleed the system afterward though. You do have very nice and informative pictorials. This is just a friendly suggestion.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual) Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
The engine was stone cold when I did the test. You will get the most blow-by at that point since the rings etc. have not yet reached maximum expansion to make a better seal.
__________________
1981 300D 147k 1998 VW Jetta Tdi 320k 2001 Dodge Ram 2500 141k 1979 300D 234k (sold) 1984 300D "Astor" 262k(sold) Mercedes How-To and Repair Pictorials I love the smell of diesel smoke in my hair |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Wow!
I did that very same thing to mine, and not only did the cap "dance"...it nearly shot through the hood...no joke. Not seriously burning oil though, so I guess I'm okay for now? I think I'm gonna watch that again. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
mine smokes at the oil filler hole, when cap is off when engine is hot but not when its cold. i guess its just smoke fom heat. or is it also blow by???? i already have 322K+ miles, all original? starts right up when its freezing cold as long as its glow plugged.
__________________
'85 300D Turbo - CA Version |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
blow by
could the 0 blow- by be the effects of the bosio nozzels doing an efficeint job of spraying.I would like to know if the fuel economy went up with the new bosios,
let us know Russell if it made a difference. Thanks. Peter 1984 300d 262 k |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
The problem is doing it stone cold. There is blowby, but it's all air. The oil isn't hot enough/churned enough to make the visible vapor.
Show a video of the blowby when the engine is at 82*c. I can run my beat up engine stone cold and make it look blow-by free. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
sorry guys
bah, anecdotal blah blah (IMO) normally connected there is negative pressure "at" the valve cover with an open valve cover it is at atmospheric pressure at the valve cover opening visible vapors will depend on a variety of circumstances; differential temps, relative humidity, etc - if blowby is not observed with the breather tube still connected little is actually known as the breather tube is still sucking; sure blowby is being observed (or not), but its better with some numbers that being said, I have 2 617s; one shows nothing hot or cold, and the other is like Vesuvius I 'do' thermodynamic testing and have some fine calibrated differential pressure meters -> anyone have a spare cap to donate ? I will tap it and generate some 'real' numbers under various conditions and RPMs
__________________
Bill '82 300SD 195K '84 300SD 199K |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
I think the important test is that if the engine starts when it gets "cold" in your area without giving you trouble the compression is fine. Thats the test that counts.
Really its all acidemic because unless you are going to spend at least $3k to rebuild the bottom end, you can't do anything about blow by. Like I said my 617 chugs like a train, but it will start without a block heater in the mid teens. In my case it is just acceptable. I have been SOL on a couple of mornings last winter when I didn't plug her in.
__________________
1999 SL500 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Nonetheless, and in spite of the blowby (much more than DG's fine example), my car (212,000 original miles) uses no oil between changes (3000 miles), or at least not enough to be noticeable. It starts easily when cold, although that's a relative term -- it doesn't get cold here as far as this ex-Wisconsinite is concerned. At Christmas I'll be in snow country and will see how it does then (with DG's radiator hose engine heater kit). Jeremy
__________________
"Buster" in the '95 Our all-Diesel family 1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car 2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022) Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762 "Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz." -- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970 |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
As soon as I get one in I will do a video so those that don't know can see a car with lots of blow by.
Anyone in Atlanta got one to use as a candidate?
__________________
1981 300D 147k 1998 VW Jetta Tdi 320k 2001 Dodge Ram 2500 141k 1979 300D 234k (sold) 1984 300D "Astor" 262k(sold) Mercedes How-To and Repair Pictorials I love the smell of diesel smoke in my hair |
Bookmarks |
|
|