Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-10-2006, 08:18 PM
beaulieub's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Alton Bay, NH / Yuma, AZ
Posts: 203
350 Oil Consumption

I've searched the archives and cant find the answer to this question - hoping you guys can answer it for me. If a 90 350SDL was burning oil as a result of the infamous rod-bending and the cylinder wall was ovalling, would the rate of consumption be constant no matter the driving conditions or speed? I'm seeing about 1 qt consumption in maybe 400 miles of various driving patterns - some light city trafic other 70 MPH highway stuff. However, when a few weeks back I did no driving greater than 55 MPH and travelled about 650 miles and only consumed 1/10 of a quart of oil. This is a new car for me so I have no info on previous consumption. It has 190K and runs beautifully and is fast for a diesel. Im hoping this irregular oil consumption means it at least isn't leading to rod-bending but maybe at high speeds the turbo is sucking the oil out or something similar. What do you think?
Also, Is an EGR valve the same as a PCV? Where is it located on this engine? I hear talk about a crossover pipe but dont know where/what it is.

Thanks in advance.

__________________

1979 300SD 83k miles Astro Silver Metallic/Black leather #3447
1990 350SDL 202k miles (3L engine from an 87 300D)Black/Grey leather
2006 Pleasure-Way Class B MoHo (Sprinter chassis) 134k miles
2005 E320CDI 270k (car is sooo fast - I can't believe it's a diesel!!!)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-10-2006, 08:25 PM
jshadows's Avatar
Bob
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Paris, FR
Posts: 737
can't answer your question directly, but check turbo too...bad oil seal will throw all kinds of oil back into engine. rather than back into the pan.
__________________
1982 300TD 210K miles ("The Replacement" aka "The Anvil") - SOLD
1979 300SD 245K miles (never ending project)
2007 Pinarello F3:13
1995 Ducati 916 (SOLD, sniff)
1999 Ducati 900SSie (SOLD)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-10-2006, 08:41 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
A leakdown test will help you determine if oil is coming up past the rings. A compression test will probably tell you as well since I don't think these engines bend all rods... and certainly not at the same rate.

PCV (positive crankcase ventilation) is not EGR (exhaust gas recirculation). The exhaust manifold has a corrugated pipe that feeds the EGR valve attached to the mixing pipe. That's the pipe that sits above the turbo compressor outlet and feeds the intake manifold.

The crossover pipe is the pipe that goes across the valve cover to bridge the turbo and the intake manifold.

Sixto
... stay tuned
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-10-2006, 08:46 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
My belief is that once the cylinder is ovalized, the rings are compromised and the engine will burn oil at a relatively steady rate. Sure, the consumption will rise with increasing crankcase pressure caused by oil passing the rings on all stokes but the power stroke. But, overall, the consumption is not going from 1 quart every 400 miles to 1 quart every 2000 miles by simply changing driving patterns.

My experience with the turbo also points to relatively steady oil consumption..........independent of driving patterns. The turbo is going to leak/consume oil based upon oil pressure and there is not much that is going to affect this unless you run the vehicle at idle.

The EGR valve is not the PCV. The valve is located on the passenger side of the engine.......close to the front. It has a corrugated steel tube extending from the bottom of the valve that attaches to a boss on the exhaust manifold.


The crossover pipe is exactly what it sounds like. The aluminum tube over the top of the valve cover that takes the compressed air from the turbo and dumps it into the manifold. Open the hood. It's the very first thing you'll notice.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-10-2006, 08:49 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
Brian: "It has a corrugated steel tube extending from the bottom of the valve that attaches to a boss on the exhaust manifold."

Sixto: "The exhaust manifold has a corrugated pipe that feeds the EGR valve..."


Is this a chicken or the egg thing?

Sixto
... stay tuned
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-10-2006, 09:01 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixto View Post
Brian: "It has a corrugated steel tube extending from the bottom of the valve that attaches to a boss on the exhaust manifold."

Sixto: "The exhaust manifold has a corrugated pipe that feeds the EGR valve..."


Is this a chicken or the egg thing?

Sixto
... stay tuned

.........did you backwards learn me that..................
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-10-2006, 09:51 PM
beaulieub's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Alton Bay, NH / Yuma, AZ
Posts: 203
So, does anyone have any explaination for the difference in oil consumption?
__________________

1979 300SD 83k miles Astro Silver Metallic/Black leather #3447
1990 350SDL 202k miles (3L engine from an 87 300D)Black/Grey leather
2006 Pleasure-Way Class B MoHo (Sprinter chassis) 134k miles
2005 E320CDI 270k (car is sooo fast - I can't believe it's a diesel!!!)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-10-2006, 10:43 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by beaulieub View Post
So, does anyone have any explaination for the difference in oil consumption?
I'll take a crack at it, but, admittedly I have no data.

At 55 mph, the engine can basically run without any boost.......just about zero manifold pressure/vacuum. The engine is lightly loaded and produces a certain amount of blowby, which has some oil in the stream, and it's burned in the engine.

At 70 mph, you're definitely into boost.......maybe 5 psi........and the engine is loaded to a greater degree.........and the blowby is increased. More oil goes to the turbo and is sent back to the engine for burning.

The difference is far greater than what I would have expected, but, if the data is accurate, it might be a decent theory to prove.

You can always run the hose from the top of the valve cover into a small bucket and see how much oil accumulates over a specific mileage. This would confirm or deny whether the cause of the consumption is blowby.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-11-2006, 12:40 AM
beaulieub's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Alton Bay, NH / Yuma, AZ
Posts: 203
I read somewhere to put a copper T-Fitting into the hose from the valve cover and catch the oil. But I'm wondering if doing that would cause less oil to be sucked into the turbo because of the new opening into the catch bucket.
__________________

1979 300SD 83k miles Astro Silver Metallic/Black leather #3447
1990 350SDL 202k miles (3L engine from an 87 300D)Black/Grey leather
2006 Pleasure-Way Class B MoHo (Sprinter chassis) 134k miles
2005 E320CDI 270k (car is sooo fast - I can't believe it's a diesel!!!)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-11-2006, 01:00 AM
beaulieub's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Alton Bay, NH / Yuma, AZ
Posts: 203
Also if oil is going into the turbo, wouldn't the crossover pipe be gunked? Would it be helpful to remove it and examine for oil? Seems like that might be easier than removing the turbo to look. Also, does this engine have a PCV and where would it be. I did find the EGR. Thanks
__________________

1979 300SD 83k miles Astro Silver Metallic/Black leather #3447
1990 350SDL 202k miles (3L engine from an 87 300D)Black/Grey leather
2006 Pleasure-Way Class B MoHo (Sprinter chassis) 134k miles
2005 E320CDI 270k (car is sooo fast - I can't believe it's a diesel!!!)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-11-2006, 01:28 AM
Blevinsax's Avatar
'91 350SD GreaseCar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 480
EGR Photo...

I've read several times that it is advised to disconnect the EGR on the 350SD's and I'm curious about two things:

First - please explain why that is beneficial; I don't mean to question, just that I'm new to diesel/Mercedes, so I don't know that much.

Second - would someone please put a photo of the EGR valve so I can find it in my engine, too? I've read the descriptions, but as the old saying goes, "A picture is worth a thousand words!"

Oh yeah, and third - how would one go about disconnecting it???

Thank you very much!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-11-2006, 05:09 AM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
The EGR system allows exhaust gas to flow into the intake stream. The mixture of hot sooty exhaust, crankcase vapors and as the car ages oil leaking past the turbo seals conspires to send goop through the intake manifold and into the cylinders. If you pull the crossover pipe you'll likely see 1/4" or more of oily soot on all internal surfaces.

So reason 1 for disabling the EGR system is to prevent this sooty build-up. Reason 2 is there is speculation that chunks of soot get into the cylinders. This soot is not very compressible so the connecting rods struggle to push the piston to top dead center and eventually yield.

To find the EGR valve, follow the crossover pipe from the intake side of the engine to the exhaust. It will bend down towards the mixing pipe which was an appendage bolted to it. The appendage is the EGR valve. You'll see a metal pipe with an accordion section leading to the intake manifold.

The methods of disabling the EGR valve include impeding the vacuum signal to the EGR valve canister and fitting a blocking plate between the EGR valve and mixing pipe. You can remove all the EGR components and plug all the holes, of course.

Sixto
... stay tuned
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-11-2006, 06:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,182
EGR disablibg is not legal!
A BB or two falling into the vac. line is an unfortunate accident.
Make certaing the egr valve is not sticky if you are going the BB accident route.
__________________
82 300D....went to MB heaven
90 350 SDL....excercising con rods
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-11-2006, 02:02 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by andmoon View Post
EGR disablibg is not legal!
That too

Sixto
... stay tuned
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-11-2006, 02:22 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixto View Post
The methods of disabling the EGR valve include impeding the vacuum signal to the EGR valve canister and fitting a blocking plate between the EGR valve and mixing pipe. You can remove all the EGR components and plug all the holes, of course.
.........sometimes you can purchase a kit that removes the valve completely............for testing purposes only, of course..........

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page