Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-14-2006, 03:53 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 109
Buy or not to buy? 91 300SDL.

Aloha from Maui !
I love my 88 300TD BUT ! Can't live without using biodiesel.There's 91 300SDL with 180kmiles on clock for sale. Here on forum i've learned that it's 603.970 is "worst diesel engine made by mercedes" so my questions are:
-what are chances that it will keep running?
-what shall i check when i will go to see it on saturday?
Thank you for your time
Petr

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-14-2006, 05:05 AM
Jim B.'s Avatar
Who's flying this thing ?
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N. California./ N. Nevada
Posts: 3,611
Check the many forum threads on this motor,under 350SD, 350SDL, and rod bender...The 350 diesel is unfortunatgely known as the "rod bender" motor and is generally regarded as Mercedes' worst diesel effort, usually to be avoided. (Though some people have reported it as giving them no trouble however)

The humidity in Hi. can cause rust so check for it, and these cars have problematic air conditioners, so be sure it blows cold, and try to get service records and stamped books, if possible, and look for evidence of prior accidents or bodywork.

There's a useful and rather long buyers guide for the W126 models (sedans and coupes) which I co-authored with Satish Tummala back in 1998. It caters primarily to the 560 coupe model, but can be applied to a diesel sedan as you are considering. Click www.mbcoupes.com (buyers guide.)

The W126 models are probably thin on the ground in Hawaii, though.
__________________
1991 560 SEC AMG, 199k <---- 300 hp 10:1 ECE euro HV ...

1995 E 420, 170k "The Red Plum" (sold)

2015 BMW 535i xdrive awd Stage 1 DINAN, 6k, <----364 hp

1967 Mercury Cougar, 49k

2013 Jaguar XF, 20k <----340 hp Supercharged, All Wheel Drive (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-14-2006, 10:00 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mauidieselpetr View Post
so my questions are:
-what are chances that it will keep running?
-what shall i check when i will go to see it on saturday?

The chances of keeping it running are 100%, provided you have an $8K reserve account if the engine goes south.

The vehicle has a multitude of things to check to determine if it's got 180K on the clock with no maintenance or repairs or if it's got $10K of maintenance over the years. This is best done by an independent mechanic who is familiar with the vehicles. It's not possible to go and kick the tires and make any kind of proper judgment about it, unless you are very familiar with that specific vehicle.

There is nothing that can be checked to determine if the engine already has a bent connecting rod. It will idle and drive perfectly fine, unless it's already an advanced case and the idle has deteriorated due to poor compression in the affected cylinder.

Figure your odds at 1:3 that the engine will develop a bent rod at some point in its life.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-14-2006, 05:18 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
Why can't you run biodiesel in the 300TD? Is it an 88 or 87?

Sixto
93 300SD
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-14-2006, 05:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada.
Posts: 6,510
At this point a lot of the 3.5 litre equiped cars are going to be for sale. As long as one factors in putting a short block 3 litre in you should be safe. If the 3.5 litre lives fine if not you have allowed for it. A not unreasonable barganing point at time of purchase. If you see the lack of material between the bores on the 3.5 engine versus the 3 litre it gives some insite to the probable causitive factor. Or perhaps just the contributing lack of strength compared to the 3 litre. If you cannot factor it into the deal I would purchase a car with perhaps a better engine track record. Just some observations as to how I visulise a car with that particular engine. Others opinions will totally vary and thats what makes the world go round. As mentioned the balance of the car should be really checked out by somebody with extensive knowledge of this model anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-24-2007, 04:55 PM
pwogaman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northern, Virginia
Posts: 2,034
Would it be possible to insert sleeves into a 350 block to bring it back to a 300?
__________________
http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/l...aman/Fleet.jpg

Peach Parts W124.128 User Group.

80 280SL
85 300SD
87 300TD
92 300D 2.5 Turbo
92 300TE 4Matic

Last edited by pwogaman; 07-24-2007 at 05:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-24-2007, 06:39 PM
bustedbenz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Valle Crucis, NC
Posts: 2,283
Even if you did sleeve it down to a 300, what have you gained? Less horsepower with the same rod issue as before, right?
__________________


~Michael S.~
Past cars:

1986 300SDL
1987 300SDL
1982 240D
1982 300SD


Current:

1987 300SDL
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-24-2007, 06:55 PM
pwogaman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northern, Virginia
Posts: 2,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by bustedbenz View Post
Even if you did sleeve it down to a 300, what have you gained? Less horsepower with the same rod issue as before, right?
Not if you get a set of 300 rods. Granted you will have less HP, but at least the issues of failure might be mitigated. I don't have this as a problem myself - just wondering.
__________________
http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/l...aman/Fleet.jpg

Peach Parts W124.128 User Group.

80 280SL
85 300SD
87 300TD
92 300D 2.5 Turbo
92 300TE 4Matic
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-24-2007, 07:31 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
Were you thinking of moving the 3.0 reciprocating assembly into the 3.5 bock? Much easier and cheaper to start with a running 3.0 block, If it comes out of a running car, it's very likely a useable block. Swap the 17 head of the 350 if that makes you feel better but no need to touch the bottom end.

If you're thinking of using 3.0 pistons and rods with the 3.5 crank, it won't work - the pistons will smack into the head before the crank reaches TDC.

Sixto
87 300D
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-24-2007, 07:36 PM
Jeremy5848's Avatar
Registered Biodiesel User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sonoma Wine Country
Posts: 8,402
Just theorizing...

One of the theories advanced as to WHY the "rod-bender" bends rods is that coolant, water, or oil leaks into one or more cylinders and causes the engine to hydro-lock, thus bending a rod. I do not advance this hypothesis, just mention it as one possibility. If that were to be the case, neither sleeving nor stronger rods would help.
__________________

"Buster" in the '95

Our all-Diesel family
1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car
2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car
Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022)
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762
"Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz."
-- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-24-2007, 07:40 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Nobody knows the rod-bending cause. Unless MB comes out and tells us, anything that is said about the cause is just guessing.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-24-2007, 07:53 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
That's a widely accepted cause in the generic sense. I have two bent 3.5 rods that came off an engine that didn't have coolant leaks into the cylinders. It did have an oil leak into one of the cylinders

Sixto
87 300D
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-24-2007, 08:15 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Then what makes the 3.5L special that it sucks in oil/water/coolant to bend rods and the 3.0L does not?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-24-2007, 08:23 PM
Christian
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Western Mass
Posts: 132
1995 not a rod bender?

There is a 1995 S350D on ebay:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=020&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&viewitem=&item=300133595669&rd=1&rd=1

They claim that MB corrected the weak rod issue after 1994. Here is their explanation. Have you heard about that? (They want over $17K for the car for this reason...)

Quote:
If you're looking for 140 Chassis Mercedes Diesel, look no further. With a build date of March of 1995, this car had the updated connecting rods installed from the factory; cars manufactured before late 1994 are know as rod benders, as the connecting rods were too weak to handle the increased displacement from 3.0 to 3.5 liters and invariably lead to ovaled cylinders, excessive oil burining, and eventually the need for a new engine. This car will not have those problems. Additionally, the core evaporator, a known problem in all 140 Chassis Mercedes, is noted as being replaced in the service booklet. With an excellent color combo and only minimal wear throughout, this car is actually priced too cheap. It may cost a little more in the short term than another similiar car, but it is vastly superior to nearly all, especially those build from 92-94.
__________________
1974 240D, 125K mi, B100 now, SOLD
1980 300TD, 115K mi, 4-speed stick, roll-up windows, greasecar with two tank conversion (daily driver)
1985 300D, 220K miles, greasecar with two tank conversion, SOLD
1993 300D 2.5turbo, 158K miles, green/tan, B20-B50
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-24-2007, 09:52 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
That's just a selling point to get it selling faster. Of course he is going to describe his car as perfect.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page