|
|
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
I'm hashing out some ideas with a programmer friend of mine. My initial model uses a pressure sensor, a servo, and speed controller. They are relatively inexpensive black boxes from radio control vehicles. The turbo blades would default open by spring tension, but with the ignition key on close until XXPSI is reached, then open as wide as possible while maintaining XXPSI. One advantage is if anything electrical fails the spring should overpower the servo.
I still trying to think of a mechanical system that does the same. Oh, and high boost with low throttle position shouldn't be a problem. You ever lifted out of the throttle going up a hill? There you go.
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well. 1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26) 1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears. 1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL! 2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends) Last edited by derherr65; 10-11-2006 at 02:54 PM. |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Though... if you're going to buy a VVT then the have to re-arrange the exhaust system anyway.... perhaps it would be easier and cheaper to try sequential turbos? Basically add a little turbo and pipe it's exhaust and wastegate into the stock turbo or a slightly larger second turbo. Any thoughts, other than "Cool! A twin turbo Mercedes"?
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well. 1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26) 1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears. 1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL! 2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends) Last edited by derherr65; 10-11-2006 at 07:49 PM. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Delivery vans are the most common sources. Frito Lay, FedEx, UPS, and USPS used them the most.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
There is nothing magical needed to control a VNT turbo. All you need is a pressure actuator instead of a vacuum one and plumb it like a traditional wastegate. I've got one all set to install, I just need to make an adaptor plate and oil lines. VVT= Variable valve timing VNT= Variable nozzle technology (turbo) |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
After mapping out the lines and valves and stuff required for a sequential setup I quickly retreated back into VGT territory.
VVT = variable vane turbo/technology VGT = variable geometry turbo I don't think they've quite settled on a term yet. Quote:
Holset he300 - Variable, water cooled, 100-300HP, wastegated. Garret GT2359V - variable, 200HP, from MB 320CDI. Garrett gt1749V - variable, 150HP, volkswagen. dodge? TBO352 - variable, 175HP, 1987 dodge Garrett GT2062V - variable, 160HP, volvo Other??? Jeep liberty? Is this a variable? For $100? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=200035361367&fromMakeTrack=true
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well. 1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26) 1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears. 1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL! 2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends) Last edited by derherr65; 10-12-2006 at 12:50 AM. |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
could somebody rename this thread?
something like OM617 Turbo Upgrade: VVT vs VGT
__________________
------------------------------------------ Aquilae non capunt muscas! (Eagles don't hunt flies!) 1979 300SD Black/Black MBtex239000mi 1983 300TD euro-NA. White/Olive Cloth-MBtex 201000mi. Fleet car of the USA embassy in Morocco 1983 240D Labrador Blue/Blue MBtex 161000mi |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Ah, but then the first 1/2 of the discussion would be mislabeled... so you'd have to rename it "1/2 engine swap and 1/2 turbo swap", but then there's also several posts about injection pumps, and a few about swapping to a different car altogether... so it's really "2/5 engine swap, 1/10 injection pump, 1/10 car swap, 2/5 turbo swap"... which gets to be ungainly very quickly. Plus can you imagine the time required and confusion cause by renaming every post that drifted a little? Said succintly, accept drift, continents do it, and so do we. But a new thread for the best variable sounds perfectly reasonable.
Variable turbos, which is the best?
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well. 1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26) 1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears. 1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL! 2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends) Last edited by derherr65; 10-12-2006 at 11:00 AM. |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
True, but will it be an improvement over my stock T3 with the mentioned simple control?
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well. 1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26) 1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears. 1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL! 2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends) |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Good question. I'd be more tempted to just go the Finnish SuperTurbo route if I was going to deal with all the hassle of custom exhaust plumbing though. What it might lack in low-RPM ooomph is more than compensated for once the boost builds.
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Lol, yes, but I'd hate to try to drive a car daily with that kind of boost threshold. It should be great on the highway, but in town? Oh my!
I imagine the Holset he300 is too much, but wouldn't water cooling be nice! No coking, lower intake air temps, lower EGTs, and ability to dial in more fuel accordingly. Garrett gt1749V - variable, 150HP, volkswagen. Garrett GT2062V - variable, 160HP, volvo Garret GT2359V - variable, 200HP, from MB 320CDI. So the question is which best matches? I'm guessing the smaller garrett spools up quicker, and since it can support 150HP will easily handle a stock 617. I suppose it depends on where drivability begins to deteriorate, or where the stock IP runs out of fuel. Which happens first, and when?
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well. 1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26) 1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears. 1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL! 2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends) |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
From what they report, the in-town power is fine, better than stock... but when the boost hits, you better have the car pointed towards an empty space. I don't think the power delivery is particularly linear or flat, though, which is what the VVT would provide if implemented correctly.
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I plan on keeping to maximum boost at stock or a couple PSI above. Nothing too drastic.
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well. 1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26) 1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears. 1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL! 2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends) |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Lol
first off, this thread is great. Secondly, I would be seriously worried about twisting a MB like a pretzel with a 4BT... from what I've read they put out something like 265ft-lb stock... and as far as height goes, they are exactly the same as the 6BT... it would be cool as hell though... after you figure out how to put a tranny, driveshaft, rear end, suspension, etc etc etc that can handle the torque...
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
You missed the solution RASHAKOR and I agreed on... stock tires. You can have as much torque as you like without hurting anything as long as you keep stock tires on it. As evidenced by our driving experience, and I'm sure yours, stock tires will spin before anything breaks. It does not matter whether your engine has 200ftlbs or 700ftlbs, the tires only allow 150ftlbs(let's assume) to be transferred. That means the suspension and drivetrain are only under the force from those 150ftlbs.
It may seem counter intuitive at first, but check with a few drag racers. You can double engine power and race without breaking anything, until you upgrade the tires or suspension for more traction.
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well. 1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26) 1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears. 1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL! 2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends) |
Bookmarks |
|
|