|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
lubricity
does any body out there feel the same as I in regaurds to the lurbicity in diesel going down hill every year?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Beating a dead horse here...
You need not worry about lubricity standards, ULSD WILL NOT harm your engine. Stop worrying and just drive.
__________________
'81 MB 300SD, '82 MB 300D Turbo (sold/RIP), '04 Lincoln Town Car Ultimate Sooner or later every car falls apart, ours does it later! -German Narrator in a MB Promotion Film about the then brand new W123. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I don't know, how are you measuring lubricity?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Diesel fuel has minimum lubricity standards that must be met by the refinery on every batch.
Don't worry about it. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Others jumpped in with ULSD=OK type replies. It might well be that the newer ULSD diesel formulation doesn't exceed the lubricity requirements, but merely meets it now. Since the producers would have been phasing in refineries that meet the new standards over the last few years, then yes, it could have been declining in recent years. From the research I've done, biodiesel is better on the lubricity than ordinary diesel. A small percentage (maybe 5%?) blended in would probably fix the problem and replace some of the fossil fuel as an added bonus. I can't imagine there is anyone here on the forum that can't afford the extra $2 per fillup that'd cost -- the fluctuation in the price of diesel itself makes a bigger difference than that and I don't see anyone talking about not driving their car in summer because the cost of a fillup went up by $2.
__________________
'83 300DTurbo http://badges.fuelly.com/images/smallsig-us/318559.png Broadband: more lies faster. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Nope, I just run B100.
__________________
1979 240D- 316K miles - VGT Turbo, Intercooler, Stick Shift, Many Other Mods - Daily Driver 1982 300SD - 232K miles - Wife's Daily Driver 1986 560SL - Wife's red speed machine |
Bookmarks |
|
|