Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-14-2007, 10:26 PM
derherr65's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Texas
Posts: 305
OM617 Performance Modifications

I'd like to start a discussion of the steps for performance increases on an OM617. I'm thinking there's three basic levels, stock, serious and wild.
Stock would be no parts swapping, just tuning.
Serious could include parts swapping, but still daily driver friendly and no measureable reliability/durability decrease.
Wild would be huge power increases, but where engine reliability suffers. Very few of us want to go there.

Stock: Do your maintenance, get all the adjustments back to stock, install the proper gauges(boost, pyro), and turn up the turbo to 12-13PSI.

Serious: Do the stock stuff, and then begin turning up the IP. The IP can outfuel the stock turbo, right? So you'd need a bigger turbo and/or intercooler. What's the next step or limiting factor?

__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well.
1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26)
1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears.
1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL!
2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-14-2007, 10:28 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This is all you need to know.

http://schumanautomotive.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-14-2007, 10:30 PM
rg2098's Avatar
Detailing Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 2,415
heh, you said 617 and performance in the same sentence.
__________________
Adam Lumsden
(83) 300D
Vice-President of the MBCA International Stars Section
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-14-2007, 10:32 PM
300SD81's Avatar
1981 Mercedes-Benz 300SD
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: University of Georgia
Posts: 1,082
Get some settings better than stock, 26*BTDC is supposed to be better than the stock 24*BTDC for IP timing, disable the EGR. I think those should count under the "Stock" category too.

After you intercool, I think you can outboost the stock IP, so a rebuilt IP is next..


In like 10 years, I'm hoping to afford a rebuilt 617, Myna Diesel IP, rebuilt tranny, VNT turbo, intercooling setup, etc, and find a perfect condition 300SD body, and build my dream car
__________________
Ich liebe meine Autos!

1991 Mercedes-Benz 560SEL | Megasquirt MS3-Pro | 722.6 transmission w/ AMG paddles | Feind Motorsports Sway Bar | Stinger VIP Radar | AntiLaser Priority | PLX Wideband O2 | 150A Alternator | Cat Delete
1981 Mercedes-Benz 300SD | Blown engine, rebuilding someday...
1981 Mercedes-Benz 300SD | Rear ended, retired in garage.
2009 Yamaha AR230HO | Das Boot

Excessive speeding? It ain't excessive till I redline!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-14-2007, 10:34 PM
derherr65's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Texas
Posts: 305
One day mine will do 0-60 in under 11 seconds. And yes I mean MPH not KPH!!! Only 4 more long ass seconds to go.
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well.
1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26)
1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears.
1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL!
2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-14-2007, 11:02 PM
winmutt's Avatar
85 300D 4spd+tow+h4
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Atl Gawga
Posts: 9,346
Linkage. IP Timing (chain stretch). Pop tested Injectors. Waste gate (MBC is SOOOO much easier to install).


Most important of all, good tires and brakes.
__________________
http://superturbodiesel.com/images/sig.04.10.jpg
1995 E420 Schwarz
1995 E300 Weiss
#1987 300D Sturmmachine
#1991 300D Nearly Perfect
#1994 E320 Cabriolet
#1995 E320 Touring
#1985 300D Sedan
OBK #42
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-14-2007, 11:09 PM
derherr65's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Texas
Posts: 305
Linkage ______________ - how? My service manual is in the mail.
IP Timing (chain stretch). - How much tear down is required for this test?
Pop tested Injectors. ___ - Is that a DIY process or injector shop job?
Waste gate.___________ - Ooops, mines at 11 already!
Good tires and brakes. __ - Got 'em.
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well.
1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26)
1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears.
1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL!
2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-14-2007, 11:52 PM
rudolfgreen's Avatar
registered cruiser
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: HI
Posts: 556
Quote:
Originally Posted by rg2098 View Post
heh, you said 617 and performance in the same sentence.
lest we not forget our finnish bretheren with the fire-breathing wagun?

Last edited by rudolfgreen; 04-17-2007 at 05:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-15-2007, 12:04 AM
derherr65's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Texas
Posts: 305
You need nitrous for a sub 13 second 0-60?
My stock ratio is 3.07. A little lower would be nice for the highway.
A blower would certainly help the 60 foot time, but once the turbo spools up it never drops off boost on an automatic car. I'm thinking the blower is just a complication... unless you are doing autocross. Then maybe blower instead of turbo would be the way to go.
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well.
1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26)
1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears.
1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL!
2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-15-2007, 12:19 AM
derherr65's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Texas
Posts: 305
How much will the stock tranny handle?
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well.
1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26)
1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears.
1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL!
2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-15-2007, 12:35 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by derherr65 View Post
How much will the stock tranny handle?
At least 120hp.

Brandon and KTA-Cummins put out at least 140hp.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-15-2007, 01:47 AM
JimmyL's Avatar
Rogue T Intolerant!!!
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sunnyvale, Texas (DFW)
Posts: 9,675
Yawn......
__________________
Jimmy L.
'05 Acura TL 6MT
2001 ML430 My Spare

Gone:
'95 E300 188K "Batmobile" Texas Unfriendly Black
'85 300TD 235K "The Wagon" Texas Friendly White
'80 240D 154K "China" Scar engine installed
'81 300TD 240K "Smash"
'80 240D 230K "The Squash"
'81 240D 293K"Scar" Rear ended harder than Elton John
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-15-2007, 01:52 AM
BioPOWER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 527
If you want a "fast" diesel....find one made in '98 or later
__________________
99 E300 TD -- sold
01 540i 6 spd
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-15-2007, 10:25 AM
derherr65's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Texas
Posts: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyL View Post
Yawn......
Ditto! 140HP is not enough!
Quote:
Originally Posted by BioPOWER View Post
If you want a "fast" diesel....find one made in '98 or later
Nooooo!!! I avoid computers in my cars at all costs. Why buy a nice, simple, reliable, ignitionless diesel only to add back the failure prone electronics?
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well.
1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26)
1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears.
1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL!
2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-15-2007, 11:14 AM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by derherr65 View Post
Nooooo!!! I avoid computers in my cars at all costs. Why buy a nice, simple, reliable, ignitionless diesel only to add back the failure prone electronics?
Simple rule: Never, ever buy a car new enough to have a check engine light.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page