|  | 
| 
 K&N Air filter Anyone have experience with a K&N on an 84 300TD.  Is there anything to be gained by going to one? | 
| 
 Your turbodiesel is not being choked or strangled. There will be no gain with a K&N. | 
| 
 You gain a bit more airflow (that you cannot use) and significantly more particulate matter and dirt from the air (that the engine doesn't want). | 
| 
 If u are talking about putting it in the stock air can, u wont gain anything, just use the oem paper filters, they provide suffficient airflow. | 
| 
 No gain whatsoever. Maybe 0.0001 seconds faster 0-60 from your lighter wallet. | 
| 
 on most older european cars, the oem filter design has so much airflow, that a k&n provides no benefit. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 ^^^^ what knightrider said.  i had a 1974 dodge ramcharger 4X4 that came with a oiled air filter as oem equipment that had instructions for dusty service blah blah blah. | 
| 
 Oiled gauze/cotton and oil bath filters are very different technologies. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 I have a new in box one, if interested. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Do not use it Period. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 If you have an American car like a Mustang or something and want to get more power a cold air kit with a K&N is not a bad idea. But these are not Fords, or Chevy's, or have anything in commen with the two. In regards to high end European cars K&N filters a totaly pointless and worthless. | 
| 
 Thanks---I think. | 
| 
 There has been detailed study on a commercial diesel engine with K&N versus paper and felt filter, conclusion was K&N let in more dust and the CFM air intake factor was nothing significant over paper or felt. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Filter Efficiency is a measure of the filters overall ability to capture dirt. http://home.stny.rr.com/jbplock/ISO5...s/image002.jpg In the chart below it’s important to note the different test durations for each filter. The AC Delco filter test ran for 60 minutes before exceeding the restriction limit while the AMSOIL and K&N tests each ran for 20 and 24 minutes respectively before reaching max restriction. In 60 minutes the AC Filter accumulated 574gms of dirt and passed only 0.4gms. After only 24 minutes the K&N had accumulated 221gms of dirt but passed 7.0gms. Compared to the AC, the K&N “plugged up” nearly 3 times faster, passed 18 times more dirt and captured 37% less dirt. http://home.stny.rr.com/jbplock/ISO5...s/image010.jpg | 
| 
 ForcedInduction, Many thanks, this is the exact test I was referring to, I have a PDF saved somewhere but have to dig it up, you saved me all the trouble. | 
| 
 i finally found the info i was looking for.  this page shows that the stock paper filter for a volvo is one of the last places you should spend $ while trying to reduce airflow restriction.  mercedes filters are similar with lots of folds. http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~tcroy/articles/intakerestrictions.htm | 
| 
 Ok, I'm convinced!  Does anybody want to buy a good used K&N?  Who wants a free one? Chris | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 How many times does this myth have to be killed?   K&N filters are useless on our diesels. If you don't understand why, you should not open the hood of your car, ever, and put it on EBAY stat. Buy a ricer. Have a wonderful day. 240Joe | 
| 
 I like the K&N provided it is used appropriately.  I have one on the MB and one on the work truck.  Oil analysis, three tests to baseline each before the K&N's were installed and three afterwards were performed.  There was NO increase in silica, wear metals, etc. in any of the post tests nor have there been since.  If crap is getting past the K&N's the analysis would show it.  In my applications, low dust, on road in a fairly wet climate, they seem to work okay.  I doubt they work well in dry, dusty environments like the Southwest.  I also oil the bejeezus out of the filters. IMHO, the K&N does have a great application on MB's. Replace that Rube Goldberg affair of a filter on the 617. RT | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Answer: K&N filter topic links thread  http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/diy-links-parts-category/173036-k-n-filter-topic-links-thread-post1354738.html | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 I will take all of this as a maybe.  Guess I will install one and see what happens.  Thanks | 
| 
 Get WIX or OEM. I showed the differences in a thread a while ago between the Wix Puralotor and K&N. OEM/Wix had the highest number of folds == most amount of surface area. The k&n had the lest number of folds == least amount of area. How are you going to pass more air and less dirt with the least amount of surface area? | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Edit: Nevermind :( Quote: 
 | 
| 
 I'm sure you could find a round type with a 2 - 2.5 - 3" mouth that would seal well on the tube. That's what I'm doing, for now... | 
| 
 My intake tube is 3".  Did you just plug the other end of the round filter? | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Thanks. | 
| 
 1 Attachment(s) Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Untrue. If I was going to keep my 95 for a long time, why wouldn't I buy ONE air filter for it??? Or I can buy 10 paper ones? And throw them away when done. K&N makes sense for a car you'll keep for a while. For the economy of it, not for the performance. My CHevelle is faster with an AC filter by a tenth. Clean paper flows best., Everyone already knows that. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 If my labor for cleaning the filter were free, and I thought that the K&N did as good of a job as a paper filter, I'd have one on my car. Turns out that I value my labor quite highly. I can buy two paper filters for the time it takes to clean the K&N once. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 http://www.bolhuijo.com/airflowtest/ This says it all: "I'd feel better about it if I couldn't see so much daylight through this filter though." http://members.cox.net/lnewcomb99/Pics/KNfilter.jpg | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Does your car have a MAF? I poorly oiled K&N will kill a MAF. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Clean and re oil a K&N what 20-30 minutes? Screw that my time is worth more. | 
| 
 oil bath filter what is the method used to make the oil bath setup refered to ?  I have a 54' GMC pick-up that came with one as standard and they claimed that an oil bath air cleaner was the most effective type there was ---and the research is only 53 years old.  But the idea of a permanent filter is appealing if it really is effective.  how about an oil bath prefilter andthen the stock paper set up too,  maybe only have to change the paper every two years... | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:47 PM. | 
	Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
	
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
	Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website