Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help




Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes ShopForum > Technical Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 07-16-2007, 11:50 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 25,797
I hear every cloud has a silver lining, but with me, it's duct tape...
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-16-2007, 03:39 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada.
Posts: 6,510
Generally speaking you cannot bury rust. It seems since there is no molecular bond between the base metal and rust oxide. Plus whatever you put over it. It still aquires enough moisture probably through condensation and somehow enouigh oxygen to stay active at a lesser rate of course but still active unfortunatly.
I have even wondered if the trapped enclosed moisture breaks down to provide the oxygen by electrolysis. Since there is a minute difference in electrical potential in there as well since you are burying two different compounds. I imagine it is possible. Remember you are burying two different compounds with diferent electrical potentials under whatever youi are using. You then still have a slower acting oxide generator under the stuff.
All the time we spent with a corrosion engineer for several years. Plus the results of various efforts and applications over time have just tended to confirm his viewpoints as well.
The best way to reduce the resultant activity to the minumin seems to be petroleum products. If you still must have the rust oxide. Or total reduction of the oxide itself by converters. That may leave you with reduced electrical potentials but still there.
Better yet is total elimination of the oxide. Then your primary metal is back to it's original state other than a loss of the original amount of it.
I am thinking of longer term time frames here by the way. As keeping a car for ten years or longer with no need to do it again is important to me. The old expression there is never enough time to do it properly yet always enough time to do it over again comes to mind.
For a common sense approach where you cannot eliminate the oxide problem at least cover it with a preliminary covering of fibre fill fibrglass body fill as it is at least moisture proof. The normal body fills absorb and transfer moisture at too high a rate to use them only. Also they probably provide a reserve source to keep the oxide generator going better or longer. Usual results of their application will be bubbling through the paint much, much sooner than the fibrefill or fibreglass if you wish. .
Rust converters would also make more sense if you were not leaving two different compounds burried behind you as well. Anyways the above are just some of the reasons right or wrong that make me get all the oxide out prior to repairing or finishing an area. Another expression that rust oxide is like a form of cancer is not an overstatment in my opinion.
I am also dead gainst the concept or ideal that some moisture setting urathane materials are going to do what is claimed by them long term. I wish it were true but think othewise. If it was so there would be no reason to sandblast steel bridges for example. There is not much argument about the reduction of activity they produce. They do just not totally eliminate it in my opinion.

Last edited by barry123400; 07-16-2007 at 03:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-16-2007, 05:44 PM
patbob's Avatar
Its a Whatsit
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 836
Quote:
Originally Posted by barry123400 View Post
Since there is a minute difference in electrical potential in there as well since you are burying two different compounds.
Interesting factoid I looked up years ago in HS.. electrochemically speaking, the iron wants to corrode to "protect" the rust. Sort of like zinc will corrode to protect iron. Of course, what it thinks it's protecting it from is beyond me . Probably explains why rust just keeps going and going and going once started.

I like your idea of electroylzing water to provide the Oxygen, but I don't think the electrical potential is there to really do that.. unless the carbon in the steel plays an electrical potential role here?
__________________
'83 300DTurbo http://badges.fuelly.com/images/smallsig-us/318559.png

Broadband: more lies faster.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-16-2007, 06:24 PM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,767
Nothing is being protected. The zinc has a lower voltage potential than iron, thus more available electrons, so it gives up electrons. Electro-galvanic corrosion is all about which is the more noble metal, which has more electrons in a paring, magnesium is worse still. Whenever two metals are togeter it needs a dielectric coupling of some sorts, a rubber gasket etc., the Navy has extensive experience and technical papers on corrosion if the subject interests you further.

In cars, it is usually best to remove any rusted metal and start from there, it is extremely difficult to stop rust. Some treatments such as Naval Jelly will remove substantially all of the rust with an acid etching process, and I have had some luck with "rust converter" paint-on treatments if the rust is all exposed and cleaned first. Sandblasting and cutting is the normal treatment when restoring old automobiles and boats however, complete and permanent.
__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-16-2007, 11:06 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,267
All I know is I painted the rust and filled the holes with an awsome epoxy. I used great rust proofing paint, not POR15 but there are a million brands...yet the rust returns.

Rounds 2:
Cut off wheel, welder, and some new metal!

It won the battle but will lose the war!
__________________
2017 Chevy Silverado 1500 LTZ
Mercedes??

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2011 Pelican Parts - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page