|
|
|
#91
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry for the double post
__________________
Jim Messina 1983 300 SD 2006 Silverado Z71 |
#92
|
||||
|
||||
Did you install new lower control arm bushings too? Always wondered if changing those + balljoints would give me a better ride.
__________________
1985 CA 300D Turbo , 213K mi |
#93
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? As long as they would add one additional commandment for you to keep thy religion to thyself. George Carlin (Wonder where he is now..) 1981 240d (engine donor 1983 240d) recently rebuilt engine hurray! - No more.. fought a tree and the tree won. pearl black 1983 240d 4speed (Converted!@$$%) atleast the tranny was rebuilt. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Presumably it has a point of peak torque. It might be 425 lb-ft @2385 rpm.
I don't believe the 2400 rpm figure. Peak torque must be higher than this speed. The Germans rated the 617 at 2400 rpm as well. It's a blatant mistake. |
#95
|
||||
|
||||
I have a 300cdt and i drive it the same way. mine redlines at 5200 though, in neutral that is. no mater how much i beat my benzo, i never seem to hurt it. it truely seems bulletproof.
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
If I remember correctly, that peak torque figure at 2400 rpm for the 617 was from 2400 rpm - 3300 rpm or around there. With hp flat as can be after that, and the torque curve falling off quite a bit, and then REALLY diving after 4400 rpm (peak hp).
__________________
1987 300SDL (324000) 1986 Porsche 951 (944 Turbo) (166000) 1978 Porsche 924 (99000) 1996 Nissan Pathfinder R50 (201000) |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
There can be only one "peak". Sure, it can be reasonably flat while it climbs............but, the peak is at a single rpm. The peak HP is also at a single rpm. The new approach to specifying a "range" where the torque is applicable is strictly a marketing gimmick. |
#98
|
||||
|
||||
I've got the 2.88. I would like a 2.47 mated with the 4spd manual that had a real short first gear. 4th gear wouldnt be a prob with IC and 20psi I would think.
__________________
http://superturbodiesel.com/images/sig.04.10.jpg 1995 E420 Schwarz 1995 E300 Weiss #1987 300D Sturmmachine #1991 300D Nearly Perfect #1994 E320 Cabriolet #1995 E320 Touring #1985 300D Sedan OBK #42 |
#99
|
||||
|
||||
funny name
__________________
http://superturbodiesel.com/images/sig.04.10.jpg 1995 E420 Schwarz 1995 E300 Weiss #1987 300D Sturmmachine #1991 300D Nearly Perfect #1994 E320 Cabriolet #1995 E320 Touring #1985 300D Sedan OBK #42 |
#100
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Mine sees 3800 quite a bit, and every once in a while I'll let her hit 4500 just to hear the turbo scream (and that's about all it's doing! )
__________________
-Matt EPA Section 609 Certified MVAC Technician ----------------- Oil Burner Kartel Member #10 Ahh the smell of Diesel Fuel, it's like coffee in the morning! My Car: 1982 300SD Turbo Diesel (231,500 miles!) RIP 1984 300SD Turbo Diesel Custom (235,500 mi on driveline.) - On Road!! www.icsrepair.com |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
I run a 2.47 rear in my 300TD (617) with an A/W intercooler, boost at 16psi, and full load screw turned all the way in. I get about 18 second 0-60... I drive around with it in D most of the time (at around 1800rpm (or lower) on back roads, up around 2700rpm at 75 on the highway, IIRC, its been a while since I have driven my car), drop it down to S on the steeper hills below 55mph (yielding more than 2400 but less than 3K rpm). I can say for sure I know the engine makes torque well below 2000rpm if you give it fuel, but it won't build max boost until 2400rpm, so I suspect the torque peak is somewhere between 2400 and 3000rpm... Also, I find that if I wind it way up on my 0-60 it doesn't go a whole hell of a lot faster than if I stay under 3100 or so... thats what makes me think peak torque is between 2400 and 3000. Oh, btw, with all the mods I think I am getting BETTER fuel economy... I have to do more testing to make sure.
Another thing: you can make the automatic tranny serve to your benefit with the 2.47 rear if you adjust the shift points via the bowden cable, and the TC acts like a crawl gear!!! I wouldn't even think about putting a 2.47 in back of a manual 4spd unless the gearing was just right. I think I would rather have more like 6 speeds if it was manual.
__________________
99 E300 Turbodiesel 100k |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'm sure 2.88 (even 2.47) is more than adequate for flatlands at sea-level, but I spend a fair amount of time driving up significant hills at altitude. Today I drove from WA state to WY on I-84/I-80, several 5% grades with 75 mph speed limits. Tomorrow morning I drive across WY to denver, over the continental divide. Even with 3.07 gears, I can't maintain 80 mph on all the grades. BTW, I drove most of the way across OR with a pretty cool looking Maybach (a 57, I think). I didn't try to race him. |
#103
|
||||
|
||||
I really haven noticed that above 4000 RPM the acceleration is that good, so I've decided to shift the automatic at around 4000 RPM and that seems to get her moving faster,,,
All you hijackers talking about 2.88's and 2.47's and 15 inch tires etc START YOUR OWN POST!!! LOL Never thought my thread would get to 7 pages,,,
__________________
Closing the store Benzbonz.biz on your smart phone or tablet. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry.
|
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Therefore, the HP peak is always the preferred shift point, if the lowest ET is desired. In the case of the 617, that's 4400 rpm. |
Bookmarks |
|
|