PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/)
-   Diesel Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/diesel-discussion/)
-   -   Gain 5% mpg... (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/diesel-discussion/199027-gain-5%25-mpg.html)

jbach36 09-05-2007 07:00 PM

Gain 5% mpg...
 
Ok guys, here it is.

I had a previous thread on Diesel Kleen. So that everyone has access to this mpg info, I want to post the reply I got from DK about the extra mpg they claim. It's an "up to 8%", and someone said well, 0% gain is part of "up to". But the bottom line is, sounds like they have a fair claim at about 5% gain by using it. Here's their reply to me.......

Cetane is a very powerful energy compound that helps the fuel to ignite
a split second sooner which helps the fuel burn more completely, reduces
engine knock and helps reduce emissions.

The Department of Energy, Clean Cities Tennessee and Wal Mart
Transportation all conducted their own testing using their own equipment
and test set up and they found that fuel economy did improve, usually
around 5% for mix fleets or vehicles, that emissions went down and the
vehicles had better performance. Clean Cities TN also ran NOx emissions
and found that Diesel Kleen reduce NOx by 9% (running) to 28% (idle).
Total Fina did a study with new injectors and found that when using a
strong detergent and strong Cetane Boost fuel economy increased 2%.

.....Jeff 1991 300d, 111k

R Leo 09-05-2007 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbach36 (Post 1612045)
Cetane is a very powerful energy compound that helps the fuel to ignite

Wrong. Cetane is actually short for Cetane Number, the measure given to describe a light oil's ignition delay or, the time period between the start of injection and start of combustion of the fuel in a compression ignition engine. It is not an energy compound.

jbach36 09-05-2007 07:18 PM

Tell Diesel Kleen that
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by R Leo (Post 1612047)
Wrong. Cetane is actually short for Cetane Number, the measure given to describe a light oil's ignition delay or, the time period between the start of injection and start of combustion of the fuel in a compression ignition eninge. It is not an energy compound.

I don't know. I just live on the planet and buy things. Maybe he skipped a finer point of the description, but that's what they sell, I assume (and hope) that they know what they're talking about.

jeff

Matt L 09-05-2007 07:19 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cetane

It's an energy compound, also called Hexadecane.

Octane is another, and cetane number is related to cetane in the same way that octane number is related to octane.

We don't burn gasoline that is 87% octane. We *certainly* don't buy gasoline that is 110% octane at the track.

Craig 09-05-2007 07:47 PM

I think it's reasonable to assume that clean injectors and increased cetane values can contribute to more complete combustion, which may increase mileage and reduce emissions. Obviously, this will provide more benefit if if your injectors are less than pristine and your compression is on the low side.

I other words, you are not going to improve performance beyond the "like new" condition, but you may help an engine that has degraded performance. You will probably still get more benefit from adjusting your valves and IP timing.

R Leo 09-05-2007 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R Leo (Post 1612047)
Wrong. Cetane is actually short for Cetane Number, the measure given to describe a light oil's ignition delay or, the time period between the start of injection and start of combustion of the fuel in a compression ignition engine. It is not an energy compound.

I stand corrected...Cetane Number (CN) is the measure of ignition delay. Cetane is the compound. Cetane has a CN of 100.

Biglex 09-06-2007 03:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt L (Post 1612058)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cetane

It's an energy compound, also called Hexadecane.

Octane is another, and cetane number is related to cetane in the same way that octane number is related to octane.

We don't burn gasoline that is 87% octane. We *certainly* don't buy gasoline that is 110% octane at the track.

hmmm, off the subject, kinda. I wouldnt burn anything OVER 87 octane in a vehicle that didnt call for it, but in my racecar, I wouldnt let pump gas see the inside of my gas can. I would be afraid to see what 110 did to my street car though. (not the benz)

aklim 09-06-2007 07:34 AM

My 99 E300 got 33 mpg cruising at 85mph. Didn't get one thing more with DK. I tried it. Of course, my IP timing was on and the injectors were clean, fluids were good, etc, etc.

DslBnz 09-06-2007 08:11 AM

There isn't an additive out there where I've noticed a difference in regards to fuel economy. Sometimes there's a bit less smoke, and an interesting odor emanates out the twin-tailpipes. Perhaps a bit more power off the line too, for the first 50 miles. But nothing lasting.

TX76513 09-06-2007 08:30 AM

Other than being green there is little financial gain from using these branded products. If the 5% gain in fuel mileage was valid that will give you another 1.25 mpg and that won't cover the bill on a quart of these products with the current fuel prices. If you look at the MSDS's for some of these products that active ingredient is usually methane or alcohol that's is what is pushing the cetane up. It's like selling bottled tap water - it's packaged conveniently for the end user.

vstech 09-06-2007 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Biglex (Post 1612451)
hmmm, off the subject, kinda. I wouldnt burn anything OVER 87 octane in a vehicle that didnt call for it, but in my racecar, I wouldnt let pump gas see the inside of my gas can. I would be afraid to see what 110 did to my street car though. (not the benz)

the only thing race gas would do to a car with low compression is plug up the catalytic converter.

aklim 09-06-2007 12:17 PM

If it gives you a solid 5% from one engine that uses it vs that same engine when it doesn't use it, you might have something. This is assuming the engine is running in top shape

ConnClark 09-06-2007 03:04 PM

I have noticed an improvement in mileage when I use power service. It makes the most difference on Diesel No.2 (summer diesel) . This is probably because Diesel No. 1 usually has a higher Cetane rating to aid in starting in the cold.

I played a bit with adding a double dose of Power Service my last road trip and I got even better mileage. It did seem to drop some of the power though. Just topping off the tank remedied that.

IMHO Power Service definitely more than pays for itself when used with Diesel No. 2. In the winter its probably a wash.

jbach36 09-09-2007 12:01 PM

Have to use it from time to time
 
I think you have to use DK from time to time to clean the injectors. My car runs quieter when I run it through, and you can't just use 4 oz. in a tank one time and say it didn't do anything. You have to run it through a few tankfuls to see a real difference, and it should quiet your engine down if it clacks. Mine clacks louder at startup of course, but then after that it quiets down.

I'm sure you'll get better mpg if your injectors are dirty vs if they're now cleaned, but still, my car runs quieter when I put DK in it from time to time.

Jeff 1991 300d, 111k

aklim 09-09-2007 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbach36 (Post 1615289)
I think you have to use DK from time to time to clean the injectors.

My car runs quieter when I run it through, and you can't just use 4 oz. in a tank one time and say it didn't do anything. You have to run it through a few tankfuls to see a real difference, and it should quiet your engine down if it clacks. Mine clacks louder at startup of course, but then after that it quiets down.

Cost me $70 to check the injectors and clean the dirty one at 120K. That is after several years. Why bother with that stuff then?

I used 4 oz and went up to 12 oz and didn't see a thing different. Maybe it is quieter but it is already quiet enough that I can't notice the difference. The wife noticed the difference with B20 in the truck. Without DK, the MB runs quiet enough. Even if it was a bit more, would it be worth the effort? IMO, NO.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website