Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2001, 07:52 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Vernon, CT
Posts: 1,848
My neighbor is still on his search for a diesel Benz. Unfortunately around here nobody is selling theirs. My niehgbor has been concertrating on the 1990-1993 diesels, but has had no luck in locating one for sale. Of course I keep telling him that there is a reason you don't see people giving them up. He is currently out of the country, so I have been searching the papers and online for him. I did find a 1987 300D that has the 6 cyl. engine. It has 181K miles and the asking price is $9500. Other than the trap oxidizer problem, anything to watch out for with these engines. Is this engine a DIYer, like my 617 engine? I have been able to find some W123 diesels, but he and his wife like the "newer", more modern look of the W124 chassis. Thanks in advance.

__________________
1999 MB SL500 (110,000 mi)
2004 Volvo V70 2.5T (220,000 mi)
2014 Tesla Model S 85 (136,000 mi)
MBCA member
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2001, 09:45 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 2,574
There's really very little difference between the 86/87 diesels and the 90-93 diesels. Both are, of course, the 124 chassis, with all its attendant strengths and known weaknesses.

Most folks probably don't realize it, but the 2.5 liter 5 in the later cars and the 3.0 liter 6 in the earlier cars are essentially the same engine. MB has for decades designed engine "families" rather than individual engines. They produced this diesel in 4, 5, and 6 cylinder versions, known respectively as the OM601, OM602, and OM603. There are many shared parts between the engine in the 90-93 cars and the 86/87 cars.

Which to purchase? I think the answer is whichever version you can find in good condition with reasonable milage. There are not many of these available, so best to take what can be found. Between two equal versions, I'd pick the newer car, though it would be quite a bit more expensive.

As for relative strengths/weaknesses: The early diesels need to have the trap oxidiser removed. However, this is free, and brings them to parity with the later diesels, which use an oxidation catalyst. The earlier cars will occasionally crack a head, which is an expensive repair. The head casting was modified during the late 80s to eliminate this problem, so this is one advantage of the later cars.

Other than that, the 90-93 cars pick up the running changes in the 124 line - upgraded interior with more wood/leather, body colored bumpers, larger a/c compressor, etc. Though nice, these are not real decision makers.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Opinions on purchasing a 1987 300D swogee Diesel Discussion 12 05-03-2005 10:27 AM
1985 300CD, 1987 300D or a 190D? Boris Diesel Discussion 2 11-06-2003 10:30 AM
1987 300d prospect pdxman Diesel Discussion 49 07-15-2003 07:17 PM
WANTED - 1987 300D turbo diesel sedan gsxr Mercedes-Benz Cars For Sale 4 06-20-2003 05:15 PM
500SL good years? bad years? spinedoc Tech Help 4 11-04-2002 04:57 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page