|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Need to swap the diff....!!!!
I was driving around in the rain last night. I was ascending a pretty big hill near my house at about 40mph. Next thing I know I was sideways! I learned a while ago that I had a non-LSD. Since I installed the boost controller it got a little dangerous. Another line on my "to do" list.
__________________
'85 300SD (formerly california emissions) '08 Chevy Tahoe '93 Ducati 900 SS '79 Kawasaki KZ 650 '86 Kawasaki KX 250 '88 Kawasaki KDX200 '71 Hodaka Ace 100 '72 Triumph T100R |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
What size and type of tires are you running on it? Are you implying you are going to install an LSD diff?
I would live with the existing 2.88 diff. You are going to spend big bucks on a LSD, I believe the one in a 6.9 may fit but isn't the same ratio so the speedo will have to be recalibrated. One should control acceleration with your right foot when you are driving under slippery conditions, don't let boost come on hard. The '85 has an edge over earlier turbodiesels in that the vacuum "flying saucer" modulator improved the trans shifts with respect to boost. Once in a while my '85 300D will break traction and its always when wet or on pine needles. the '87s however are entirely different, almost like a gasser, in that torque comes on hard when you are full throttle! I've even chirped tires on a hot day with 1-2 shift. 603's rule!
__________________
'95 E320 Wagon my favorite road car. '99 E300D wolf in sheeps body, '87 300D Sportline suspension, '79 300TD w/ 617.952 engine at 367,750 and counting! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
LOL stop driving around on bald tires and stop speeding in the wet. You have a non-LSD because MB engineers decided your diesel with all of 123hp at the crank doesn't need an LSD because it's not a 560SEL AMG. Nothing dangerous about a regular differential, this is why they are in 95% of the cars on the road.
__________________
'02 BMW 325i '85 300D 450k '93 190E 2.6 170k(killed by tree) '08 Ducati Hypermotard 1100S 6k '06 Ducati S2R800 14k(sold) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I agree, most likely what happened was your BALD or LOW quality tires hydroplaned or slipped due to the water on the road. I can just barely break my (expensive high quality) tires free in the wet from a standing start (punching the throttle), there's no way they'd come loose at 40mph in the rain if I floored it. Yeah right. The only way they're coming loose at that speed is with the brakes.
Spend the $$ on new tires, not a new differential. And, don't drive so hard in the rain! And, with the 2.88, you have even less chance of breaking them loose than with a 3.07 like most of us have.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life- '15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800) '17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k) '09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k) '13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k) '01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km) '16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I also disagree that 95% of the cars on the road have non-LSD rears. I am not saying my car is some kind of powerhouse but I often chirp the tires between shifts. I thought all along that this was related to the rear not being a posi-traction or LSD. Also, I do not drive like a maniac with my foot in the car all the time. My brother in laws old SD went like a tank in the snow. My car can't even get out of its own way with a heavy dusting of wet snow on the ground.
__________________
'85 300SD (formerly california emissions) '08 Chevy Tahoe '93 Ducati 900 SS '79 Kawasaki KZ 650 '86 Kawasaki KX 250 '88 Kawasaki KDX200 '71 Hodaka Ace 100 '72 Triumph T100R |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Your tranny is shifting too hard and/or your tires suck if it breaks loose in the wet. Mine would go nuts on a 1-2 full throttle shift when it was nice and slick out. Changing your diff wont help.
__________________
1985 CA 300D Turbo , 213K mi |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
actually, I would bet the ratio of open to LS diffs is more like 99% if you take out all the TRUE sports cars, it would be closer to 99.999% that said, modern "Smart" vehicles have an electronic lsd system built into the computer... not the same as sport car positraction, but like a hydrolic/electronic limited slip, also tied in is the throttle to cut back on boost/fuel during hazardous conditions.
My SD is quite spirited, it will break loose on turns, hills, etc. even on dry pavement. it all depends on what RPM you shift gears at and how hard the shift is. a hill with running water on it during a shift from 35 or so to downshift for more climbing power could easily cause a sideways condition... the solution is NOT TO FLOOR IT GOING UP A HILL IN THE RAIN>>>
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread "as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do! My drivers: 1987 190D 2.5Turbo 1987 190D 2.5Turbo 1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!! 1987 300TD 1987 300TD 1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere! |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
SD's did not EVER have LSD from the factory. Some of the bigger SE and SEL's did. Good luck in find it on the lot.
Just get bigger tires. Running 235 and I have to work it to break grip.
__________________
http://superturbodiesel.com/images/sig.04.10.jpg 1995 E420 Schwarz 1995 E300 Weiss #1987 300D Sturmmachine #1991 300D Nearly Perfect #1994 E320 Cabriolet #1995 E320 Touring #1985 300D Sedan OBK #42 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I will try the wider tires and definately go with a different brand next time.
thanks for the advice. I stand corrected on the LSD thing. I always assumed differently. It is amazing how I posted a simple statement (misinformed statement) and everyone jumped on my rear assuming that I am like a 16 year old. Driving with bald tires and floorting it every chance I get. You guys are disappointing at times.
__________________
'85 300SD (formerly california emissions) '08 Chevy Tahoe '93 Ducati 900 SS '79 Kawasaki KZ 650 '86 Kawasaki KX 250 '88 Kawasaki KDX200 '71 Hodaka Ace 100 '72 Triumph T100R |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I would rather be accused of driving like a 16 y/o than an old fart.
Sounds like you may have hydroplaned a bit. I have BFG tires, and they are really dicey when the pavement is wet. Thay are now due for replacement, and I am looking into Michelin or Pirelli.
__________________
RRGrassi 70's Southern Pacific #5608 Fairmont A-4 MOW car 13 VW JSW 2.0 TDI 193K, Tuned with DPF and EGR Delete. 91 W124 300D Turbo replaced, Pressure W/G actuator installed. 210K 90 Dodge D250 5.9 Cummins/5 speed. 400K |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I have Toyo's and can break them free on wet pavement. I have wondered whether it is the tires. I could do it (less frequently ) with the auto trans, much easier to do with a stick. I try not to accelerate on turns on hills in the wet.
I run 205-70-15's. I also have the 2.88 in the rear. Same horses in the front.
__________________
Peter 1985 300TD 4-speed 212K 1992 400E 343K 2001 E320 72K |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I want 15's. I have the 14 bundts.
__________________
RRGrassi 70's Southern Pacific #5608 Fairmont A-4 MOW car 13 VW JSW 2.0 TDI 193K, Tuned with DPF and EGR Delete. 91 W124 300D Turbo replaced, Pressure W/G actuator installed. 210K 90 Dodge D250 5.9 Cummins/5 speed. 400K |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I actually went to a 16" wheel. I have 225/60-16 on now. I'll see if I can fit something a little wider.
__________________
'85 300SD (formerly california emissions) '08 Chevy Tahoe '93 Ducati 900 SS '79 Kawasaki KZ 650 '86 Kawasaki KX 250 '88 Kawasaki KDX200 '71 Hodaka Ace 100 '72 Triumph T100R |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Actually the wider tires will hydroplane quicker than a narrow tire. IMHO a 225 is wider than I would want, for this and many other reasons.
With lsd you will actually go sideways quicker if you get both tires hydroplaning. Actually with hydroplaning, it doesn't matter how good your tires are, excepting of course that if they are bald of course they will hydroplane at a heavy dew! Yeah, the guys were a little rough tonight, I thought too. Tom W
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC] ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
agree with Tom
I like the look of wider tires aestetically, but for traction (except in mud maybe), skinnier is better. Pure physics: friction. I get the skinniest snows I can fit.
Tall vs short is another story. Taller rims offer better handling (less sidewall action) but are usually wider. I had 16's on my wagon loved the handling in the dry, and the look. Decided it was not worth paying $$$ for tires in that size, especially having two sets of tires for winter and summer. I think Tom is right, it seems more than a few of us have gotten 123s and 126's to spin the rear tires. It does not reflect on the driver or his tires.Your width may be your problem, vwbuge, but maybe not. I got 195's to spin on wet flat pavement. With a bad tranny at that!
__________________
Peter 1985 300TD 4-speed 212K 1992 400E 343K 2001 E320 72K |
Bookmarks |
|
|