Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 12-10-2007, 01:48 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think the concern is that you will end up over-tightening the nut on the PS pump to the point where it will be a real PITA to remove if/when you have to replace the PS pump.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-10-2007, 02:07 PM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,416
ERROR, Cam orientation

Quote:
Originally Posted by s_misins View Post
1982 300D Turbo sedan. Trying to do a valve adjustment. Have read all applicable posts without seeing solutions.

I am trying to move the engine using the Power steering pump nut and belts. I can't get to the crankshaft bolt because of the fan, etc. I also can't get up underneath. The cam moves some, but before I can get it to the closed position, the engine stops turning. I can't get it to move to the correct point.(http://dieselgiant.com/valveadjustment.htm) says, "Number 1 cyl camshaft lobe pointing straight up, 90 degrees relative to the adjusting pad. To your eye this will look like the lobe is in about the 1 o'clock position."

I have seen some posts that say that taking out the glow plugs will help... That will be my next step. Any other ideas? Thanks.
From the front of your car, looking at the engine, the cam lobe should be at 1:00 o’clock position for each lobe you are adjusting.

Cam orientation post# 106

Valve adjustment OM617 FYI.
Valve adjustment OM615, 616, 617 FYI.


http://300sd.com/?p=14
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-10-2007, 02:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
I'm 54 years old and have never had to replace a power steering pump on any car I have ever owned. Hence my lack of concern about the tightness of the nut.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-10-2007, 02:24 PM
Jordan G's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 389
sweet

Quote:
Originally Posted by kerry View Post
I'm 54 years old and have never had to replace a power steering pump on any car I have ever owned. Hence my lack of concern about the tightness of the nut.
You are my beacon of hope. I shall resume tonight and proceed with my slipshod methods.
__________________
1981 240d - 135k - Arlene
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-10-2007, 02:39 PM
Phil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sonoma County, California
Posts: 1,064
I always use a remote starter switch. They are easier to use and they are cheap. If you wanted you could make a remote starter switch but I think it would cost more for the parts than buying one. I have had mine for a long time but I think I have seen them for well under $20.
__________________
1983 300SD
200000miles
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-10-2007, 02:56 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerry View Post
I'm 54 years old and have never had to replace a power steering pump on any car I have ever owned. Hence my lack of concern about the tightness of the nut.
I hope I won't have to replace mine anytime soon; but at 400K+ miles, who knows? Anyway, I think that is why the method is not recommended.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-10-2007, 03:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,851
I did both of mine for the first time recently. On the 240, I used a combination of a hand on the fan (fixed fan in '77) and a wrench on the PS pump. I tried that on the 300, but the fan is of the clutch type, and the PS belt was too loose to turn the engine, so I just bumped the starter over with the key switch while watching through the gap between the cowl and the open hood. Worked fine for me.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-10-2007, 04:50 PM
toomany MBZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Va
Posts: 7,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil View Post
I always use a remote starter switch. They are easier to use and they are cheap. If you wanted you could make a remote starter switch but I think it would cost more for the parts than buying one. I have had mine for a long time but I think I have seen them for well under $20.
Agreed, with mobetta also, have a pic in the other computer.
__________________
83 SD

84 CD
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-10-2007, 06:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig View Post
I think the concern is that you will end up over-tightening the nut on the PS pump to the point where it will be a real PITA to remove if/when you have to replace the PS pump.
I missed that the first time; thanks for the explanation. I guess I didn't feel like I was really honking on the PS nut that hard to turn the engine but I can now see why the absolutely foolproof, safe method is to use the crank.
__________________
1995 E300 200k
1981 300GD unknown km
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-10-2007, 08:27 PM
280EZRider's Avatar
No Dumping
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern Oregon Valley
Posts: 1,599
Using the PS bolt comes from gasoline-engine procedures in which case, the spark plugs are taken out, eliminating all compression. It's a good method and it allows 1 person to turn the engine and see the cam position.

On a Diesel, with all its compression, I can't imagine doing it this way unless the glow plugs or injectors are removed. Otherwise, I agree with the other guys - use the crank-pully bolt.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-13-2007, 03:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Culver City, CA
Posts: 6
Good news. Better luck with the PS bolt, then used the starter for bumping it on later valves. No idea what caused the "locking up" sensation we had the first time. Thanks everyone. Finished the first car yesterday. 1978 may get it this weekend. Now the cars starts up right away, and runs smoothly.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-13-2007, 03:54 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
That "locking up" sensation is one of the cylinders entering its compression stroke.

__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page