|
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I was going to build a super 617 powered 300D but now I think I'm going to cut straight to a W123 EV conversion. I would rather not use a gearbox at all if I can get away with it, maybe use a Tesla motor unit swapped into the rear end or something. Leaves the engine bay free for batteries.
__________________
1978 300D, 373,000km 617.912, 711.113 5 speed, 7.5mm superpump, HX30W turbo...many, many years in the making.... 1977 280> 300D - 500,000km+ (to be sold...) 1984 240TD>300TD 121,000 miles, *gone* 1977 250 parts car 1988 Toyota Corona 2.0D *gone* 1975 FJ45>HJ45 1981 200>240D (to be sold...) 1999 Hyundai Lantra 1.6 *gone* 1980s Lansing Bagnall FOER 5.2 Forklift (the Mk2 engine hoist) 2001 Holden Rodeo 4JB1T 2WD |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Don't know much about it, but am sure others will pioneer electric motor conversions in the future. Mostly for fun, since hardly economical, even pricing your design labor at free. I thought electric motors typically spin much faster than gasoline, and give torque over a wider rpm range. Thus most transmissions will be geared too high. I understand the e-motors in hybrids (Prius) are in series w/ the gas engine and turn at the same rpm, but perhaps a special low-speed design. In many apps, e-motors use speed reduction gear boxes.
__________________
1984 & 1985 CA 300D's 1964 & 65 Mopar's - Valiant, Dart, Newport 1996 & 2002 Chrysler minivans |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
1998 E300 turbodiesel America's Rights and Freedoms Are Not The Enemy! |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
An OM617 has been swapped into almost everything else, right?
__________________
RenaissanceMan Labs: where the future is being made today. Garage: 2017 Chevy Colorado Diesel (nanny state emissions) 2005 Volvo S40 T5 AWD, 77k 1987 Mercedes-Benz 300D turbodiesel, 4 sp auto, 156k - 28.7 mpg 1996 Tracker 4x4, 2 door, 16v, 3 sp auto. 113k - 28.6 mpg WARNING: this post may contain dangerous free thinking. |
Bookmarks |
|
|