![]() |
Ford to release 65 MPG Diesel in November. . .
. . . but not in the U.S.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_37/b4099060491065.htm?chan=autos_autos+--+lifestyle+subindex+page_top+stories Otto '79 240D 4 spd |
What a bunch of idiots; they claim they can't afford to sell it in the US...I think they can't afford not to. I guess they don't want to change their image as a privider of inefficient cars and trucks.
Also this comment: "Americans see hybrids as the darling," says Global Insight auto analyst Philip Gott, "and diesel as old-tech." What a bunch of baloney...that is because the automotive industry in NA promotes that idea. |
Quote:
And a whole $1,700 more than the Prikus? That wouldn't take too long to recover getting 60mpg vs 45mpg. |
Quote:
|
In 1986
I went to Germany. I thought (equivalent to) $2.50 per gallon of gasoline was outrageous - then I learned they imported ALL of their petroleum then.
I then met and befriended a German who I've been in touch with ever since. He had a French made Renault 4, a 2+2 seater which got about 55 mpg. The only reason I never saw one in the States was emissions - no cat. not even a pcv valve, just a vent tube to the air! Fast forward to today, Mercedes actually had to put out the Bluetec to pass US EPA for diesels. Euro standards are easier to meet. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_emission_standards |
I would try and buy something like that before a hybrid.
US car makers need to bring what they do successfully elsewhere here. they are fools to think they will get differant results with the same path! |
True
Quote:
|
Quote:
If most of the people in this country knew what they were really missing out on in the European car market, there would be outrage. |
It is stupid decisions like this, that are the reason Ford (and the rest of the big 3 ) are strapped for money. If they spent 1/3 the money they did promoting the SUV lifestyle, and put it into a "clean diesel" promotion, those little cars would sell like hotcakes.
I would much rather drive one of those (based solely on looks) than a cutesy battery powered love "toy". |
Quote:
If they did, they would be shooting themselves in the foot.... Remember Big Oil Sponsors 'The Big Three' Not in their interest to release a very efficient and 'conventional' vehicle, so they just do lip-work, sell a few hybrids or EV-1 type efforts to keep up appearances.... Big Oil produces X million gallons per day...They HAVE TO SELL that same X million gallons per day OR MAKE A LOSS....:D Very simple economics..... |
ya, we have been hearing that line, we will see small diesels in the US in the next few years for how long now?
time to step up, and try something. Better than letting the company continue it's slow sink without even an attempt! Where would we be if the hi-tech companies did this. Comodore 64 anyone??? |
Government regulations have a lot to do with these
not being available in the U.S., much stricter emissions. Now, if we could find a way to graymarket these cars in and get them titled..............:rolleyes: |
Federal government just gave ford 80 million dollars to keep their engine plant up here in Canada open a little longer. As see it the big three are just about out of the car business if their posted losses are real. By that I mean they are not also including their stock price decline .
The so called big three are guilty of corporate mis management on a scale perhaps never before seen in north america. The true magnatude of their problems took many years to come to fruitation. It will be a wonder if even one of them survives the next five years. They seem to simply be outclassed in todays north american markets. How are they going to deal with all the insolvent and otherwise frustrated dealers that I suspect will be starting to bail out soon. At present their dealers service departments once a large profit centre almost appear deserted locally except for low profit warranty service. People seem to have returned to independant service outlets with a vengence after the warranty expires. Did they really expect the customer was so stupid not to recognise gouging to support the large overhead costs that dealers were forced to absorb by the big three? I remember only a few years ago the local big three dealers were strong armed into much larger new buildings on prime real estate. They were assured they would make more money. Things are coming home to roost like never before. If I were a big three dealer I would not trust the respective corporate head quarters to make any sound decisions. I think the big three have proven their respective abilities beyond question at this stage. As for them really producing a good small efficient diesel for consumers in north america. I very much doubt they will. Or even try. Instead they will just hope something else occurs to make their present lines more viable all by itself. For one I do not think that approach or stratagy is going to work. I also doubt the respective governments are going to save them as well. As for the american built battery car. Plus good hybrid variations .It is already rumored they will be too costly for mass marketing. Of course time will tell exactly how this unfolds. |
Ford of North America sucks! :rolleyes:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website