|
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Its funny but still tragic to witness 3 iconic US auto manufacturers struggling with the US market.....but some of them seem to be right on and highly successful developing and delivering products to the European market & UK including efficient diesels built in their European plants.
All the new European diesel products from Ford and GM have the lowest emissions of any diesel..... C02 is 98g/km and have very low particulate output that meet our Fed requirements and the more stringent CARB regs that 5 states use. (I am refering to the new Ford Fiesta ECOnetic Diesel) Those products are already designed, developed, tested and delivered over there. How much could it take for Ford or GM to put some of that finished product in a container and ship it here for a test of the US market. They already put out test fleets of electric and prototype technology into certain areas of the US under a lease to private individuals and companys then bring them back in for analysis.....then they ususally crush them! Why not use some of that money to test a completed vehicle platform that is a proven seller in Europe?? Europe was the birthplace of Diesel but it could be reborn here!
__________________
FRED Daily Driver: 98 E300TD 199K Hobby Car: 69 Austin Mini Past Diesels: 84 300SD, 312K 87 300SDL, 251K 94 Chev. K-1500 6.5Ltr.TD, 373K Last edited by F18; 11-14-2008 at 10:24 AM. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
What they would have to do is start a very expensive and long running marketing campaign to trumpet the benefits of Diesels. As was mentioned in a previous post the perception in this country is that Diesels are smelly, smoky, and slow. The reality is that my 1986 SDL has returned 33.5 mpg on the highway and that was at 70mph in a BIG car. I pity those people in Honda Fits and Chevy Aveos as I cruise past them.
Our domestic companies need to start bringing in Diesels from Europe and back them with unlimited power-train warranties, or at least protect them for twice as long as gassers. They also need to bring them in inexpensively and sell them at a discount to taxi fleets and to municipalities. Once the taxi drivers start talking about how RELIABLE and EFFICIENT they are the public will respond. Government also needs to do two things. 1) Set strict standards for Diesel fuel with a minimum cetane of 50 (In Europe the cetane rating is in the 60's I believe) 2) Set reasonable emission standards. Since Diesels use less fuel, their overall emissions are lower. Standards can be tough, but not to the point where it kills off the engine technology.
__________________
"I have no convictions ... I blow with the wind, and the prevailing wind happens to be from Vichy" Current Monika '74 450 SL BrownHilda '79 280SL FoxyCleopatra '99 Chevy Suburban Scarlett 2014 Jeep Cherokee Krystal 2004 Volvo S60 Gone '74 Jeep CJ5 '97 Jeep ZJ Laredo Rudolf ‘86 300SDL Bruno '81 300SD Fritzi '84 BMW '92 Subaru '96 Impala SS '71 Buick GS conv '67 GTO conv '63 Corvair conv '57 Nomad |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
I may be wrong on this, (as I usually am, according to my wife), but it seems to me that just when the American people started seeing the light, per se, in diesels and their benefits, including longevity, (i.e., less new cars sold due to longer lasting engines), is about when the oil companies quit allowing diesel prices to drop below gas prices. Even if they only let it happen in the summer months, which was ridiculous due to actual cost of refining compared to gas, it still helps people to swing their support behind diesels. Funny how when the guys I know started trading their gassers for long life, low maintenence diesels, the summer time price flips stopped coming. I think, once again, big oil and the big 3 got scared of losing their profits from gas guzzlers and throw-away cars and tried to head the wisdom off at the pass. Just a thought. My wife would probably disagree.
__________________
"Knowing is not enough, we must apply. Willing is not enough, we must do." Goethe *********************************** 1951 Chevy 3100 2003 Indian Chief Roadmaster 1983 GMC 1 ton Dually 1982 Chevy 1 ton Dually, service body (sold) '90 GMC Suburban 6.2 "SS Veg-Burban" (single tank WVO\diesel conversion) SOLD '81 300D ~ Mama's car...my job (now my car)(but still my job) SOLD '83 300sd ~ rescue car SOLD 2005 Ford Taurus (Mama's new car)(NOT my job!) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Showme.....same boat.......like the saying "if I am out sailing and she is not there, if I say something am I still WRONG?"
__________________
FRED Daily Driver: 98 E300TD 199K Hobby Car: 69 Austin Mini Past Diesels: 84 300SD, 312K 87 300SDL, 251K 94 Chev. K-1500 6.5Ltr.TD, 373K Last edited by F18; 11-14-2008 at 11:03 AM. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
There were gasoline->diesel conversions happening at that time and the stories of those get mixed up with the GM fiasco. The GM engines were "real" diesels, not conversions. Just badly designed ones. On GM in general you should read up on the Perot incident. Whenever an auto manufacturer is spending more money on researching pinstrips than they do on engine design something is out of whack. And when you then pay US$ 50 million to shut up the one person who is pointing out this fact IMO you are probably beyond help. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
What they need to do is to run a bunch of ads like the following to promote the Diesel Advantages and squash the old Diesel myths.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPNohz53NCk |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Haha, that is great. I also love how my car hardly makes any vapor from the exhaust in the cold. My last car was like a fog machine
__________________
Dan 2005 E320 CDI - 246k 1987 300SDL TD05-16g, Herlevi pump, Elbe manifold, 2.47 LSD - 213k Past: 1987 300D - 264k |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
What does "affordable" mean?
Quote:
Quote:
Jeremy
__________________
"Buster" in the '95 Our all-Diesel family 1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car 2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022) Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762 "Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz." -- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970 |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
At least here in the northeast, there is a market for diesels right now, especially amongst the younger generation. You have a really hard time getting a late model VW TDI, they are highly coveted new and used under 50k miles.
Recently, here in MA the restriction on selling diesel cars new was lifted, finally. dd
__________________
------------------------------- '85 300D, 'Lance',250k, ... winter beater (100k on franken-Frybrid 3 Valve Kit) '82 300D, 'Tex', 228k body / 170k engine ... summer car '83 300TD Cali Wagon 210k, wife's car |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
FRED Daily Driver: 98 E300TD 199K Hobby Car: 69 Austin Mini Past Diesels: 84 300SD, 312K 87 300SDL, 251K 94 Chev. K-1500 6.5Ltr.TD, 373K |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
FRED Daily Driver: 98 E300TD 199K Hobby Car: 69 Austin Mini Past Diesels: 84 300SD, 312K 87 300SDL, 251K 94 Chev. K-1500 6.5Ltr.TD, 373K Last edited by F18; 11-14-2008 at 01:09 PM. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Simple, their is no profit in diesels, the diesel car market in the US is dead.
Throw in the very high cost of making them meet currant emissions standards, with the high cost of diesel and you have somewhat of a perfect storm. They cost a ton to make, with not guarantee that your larger markets like CA won't just ban them. People don't want to buy them because diesel can be hard to find and it costs $1 or more per gallon that RUG. The diesel car will never come back in this country, its over.
__________________
1999 SL500 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Lets just merge this forum with the Tech Help section since there is no hope of Diesels coming back. |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Reality sucks. The average car buyer has no interest in diesel cars.
__________________
1999 SL500 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Not knowing they exist isn't the same thing as lack of interest.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|