|
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
...not on the headlight itself?
__________________
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7271/7...144c3fc1dc.jpg |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
I used the yellow tinted Xpel on Cibie e-code 5" highbeams in my fog lamp sockets. They look like stock fogs but iluminate like good driving lights. Any degradation from the film or the clear film on my 7" headlights is less than even slightly dirty headlamps.
I did remove the headlamps and took them indoors where it was warm to apply the film.
__________________
Ron Schroeder '85 300 Turbo Diesel 2 tank WVO '83 300 Turbo Diesel 2 tank WVO Some former WVO vehicles since ~1980: '83 Mercedes 240D '80 Audi 4000D '83 ISUZU Pup '70 SAAB 99 with Kubota diesel '76 Honda Civic with Kubota diesel '86 Golf Several diesel generators All with 2 tank WVO conversion LI NY |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Degradation to the light output, not the lense. Whenever you put something on a light you change the optics. This is why my design was static-cling, I took them off when I needed the excellent optics that I bought the lights for.
Worse still are the covers that go in front of the lights, first-surface reflection, dirt between them, poor light transmission, ... this is the reason I invented the static-cling light covers long before anyone else thought of the adheasive versions. Still however, they do change the optics because they change the thickness of the lense (which is carefully designed at the current thickness) and they have a different refractive index as well. I'm picky about light output and control, it's part of what I do.
__________________
Gone to the dark side - Jeff |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
OK, I see what you are saying. It didn't make sense to me how it would degrade the lense. I am very picky on how my light projection as well, but I would rater protect my investment than waste the money for these lights. I have terrible luck with rocks hitting me anyways.
I am still pretty sure that a set of euros with the film and a good set of bulbs will put out more light than the us spec stockers. If you run across some of the film, let me know. BTW, how thick are yours?
__________________
My Primary Driver - '85 300CD - 4-speed conversion, 2.47 rear, lowered, euro headlights, rebuilding (not restoring so much) Wife's - '08 Saab Sportcombi Aero Riding a '03 Yamaha Warrior |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Almost all of the light control in a headlamp is in the reflector; the lens is primarily a cover to keep the reflector clean. As such (in the terminology that we optical engineers use) the lens is a close approximation of a plane-parallel plate. It adds a little astigmatism to the overall light pattern but that is designed out by a minor tweak in the curvature of the reflector. Adding a plastic film coating such as X-pel will change the thickness a bit and (as babymog says) the plastic has a different index of refraction. However, the effect should be secondary at best and certainly is less than a lens full of rock pits. Anyone who is seriously concerned about getting the last inch of performance out of headlamps will replace the glass lenses every year anyway; the rest of us can use X-pel.
Jeremy
__________________
"Buster" in the '95 Our all-Diesel family 1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car 2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022) Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762 "Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz." -- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970 |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
So it's best to get new lenses, and then use the protector film, and pointless to add the film to lenses that are already pitted?
__________________
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7271/7...144c3fc1dc.jpg |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Don't bother covering pitted lenses
Quote:
The left lens was broken when we got the car so I replaced it immediately. Here is a picture of the new left lens after installation (but before X-pel). The right lens was pitted but not broken so I left it until I was ready to install the X-pel film. At that time I bought a new right lens. Fortunately, the new left lens had not gotten damaged in the meantime. Here is a picture of the old right lens. It is probably the original (11 years and 250,000 miles). The focus is not as good as the first picture but you get the idea . . . Jeremy
__________________
"Buster" in the '95 Our all-Diesel family 1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car 2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022) Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762 "Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz." -- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970 |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|